Is that a serious question? Your cynicism is blinding you. If you can find someone is negligent that's liability and opens up legal avenues. Damages, Remedies, etc.
@alexjc
-
Negligence in AI Due Diligence Requirements
By
–
If that's the case it's proof of negligence. They should have done their due diligence and lack of such information is also problematic.
-
Government Accountability and FOI Procedures Legal Framework
By
–
This is misdirection. There are ways to phrase it as an FOI. An MP has neither inside information (e.g. from cabinet) nor any legal responsibility on the outcome, so that sidequest would be a complete waste of time.
-
UK Parliament and Lords debate AI legislation process
By
–
It's bouncing back and forth between parliament and the lords, right? The "cabinet" itself doesn't have anything to do with the bouncing back and forth?
-
Liability for Infringing AI Tools: Legal Responsibility
By
–
Next step could be to write them asking who is liable if the tools are found to be infringing.
-
Video Forensics Detecting Deepfake Artifacts and Manipulation
By
–
Reaching a stage where video forensics need to level up!
— Alex J. Champandard 🌱 (@alexjc) 2 juin 2025
Whole thing is uncanny but finding the evidence is harder:
– 0:00 fingers pass through wire
– 0:01 ring fades in from nowhere
– 0:04 twiddling fingers seem to disappear
– 0:06 tongue morphs into teeth
– bricks in… https://t.co/5yXecM19bmReaching a stage where video forensics need to level up! Whole thing is uncanny but finding the evidence is harder:
– 0:00 fingers pass through wire
– 0:01 ring fades in from nowhere
– 0:04 twiddling fingers seem to disappear
– 0:06 tongue morphs into teeth – bricks in -

Memory Overwriting and AI Ethics: Eternal Sunshine Concern
By
–
It's a different person! This is like overwriting memories with slop. Eternal Sunshine of the Slopfull Mind
-
Think-Tank Bias and Intellectual Independence in Policy
By
–
@TimSweeneyEpic Tim, Lazar works for a "privately funded" think-tank that "informs public policy debates". He was recruited because of alignment of his opinions and can't change his mind without losing that affiliation: it's like chatting to a bot. Real humans change their minds.
-
White House Fires Copyright Office Head Amid AI Policy Tensions
By
–
For context, the Head of the Copyright Office was fired shortly after by the Whitehouse, but theoretically it's under the purview of Congress not the executive.
-
USCO Firings and Legal AI Interpretation Publishing
By
–
Maybe! I believe the key firings at USCO were known in advance and that was the deciding factor. People getting fired wanted to leave a mark by publishing a correct legal interpretation instead what they were being (implicitly) told…