My theory is that Enterprise codebases have a very low density of functionality per character, so if you're doing Java or C++ on a million-line codebase — yeah I could see the frustration.
@alexjc
-
Copyright Policy and Creator Rights in AI Era
By
–
Notice how all the top influencers are saying the same thing now, the message is "Copyright is not the right tool to make policy changes for the future…" Clearly, it would be harmful if creators had rights!
-
AI Model Training on Artist Work Without Consent
By
–
Do I understand correctly that an independent expert reproduced an AI Artist's image and the only way to do that was to include R3's name in the prompt? Yeah, it shows intent and that the original model was likely trained on their work too?
-
Copyright and Transformative Use in AI-Generated Content
By
–
It's important to distinguish non-expressive use (inputs not even covered by Copyright, which some AI novices claimed) and non-expressive purpose (output that "Adds No New Creative Content", e.g. Books) that can show 'transformative use' after prima facie infringement was found.
-
Legal Analysis: AI Training, Copyright Infringement, and Fair Use
By
–
No, Brian is either senile or trolling. Sony was about contributory infringement, Fair Use analysis was thus done for private viewers. The Google Books case was deemed "non-expressive purpose" but their reproductions obviously contained expressions hence prima facie infringing.
-
Fair Use Analysis and AI Model Training Legal Arguments
By
–
Your arguments do not make such a clear distinction. If uses before training all went through a Fair Use analysis, they *must* have been expressive. The fact downstream uses are potentially non-expressive helps the affirmative defense if defendants can provide proof.
-
Copyright Verdicts on AI Training and Fair Use Analysis
By
–
"essentially" doing a lot of heavy lifting. All the verdicts fell under Copyright law that's why they did the Fair Use analyses. Thus, it must have been expressive each time. Training often does capture expressions; verdict mentions this as "compressed copies". Keep up!
-
Training Data Copyright: Legal Analysis of AI Model Development
By
–
You speak in the future as if it didn't happen; deluding yourself? It did happen multiple times already and each time analysis was conducted under Copyright law. The uses before training were found to be expressive because all the work was used.
-
Copyright Fair Use Analysis in AI Model Training
By
–
You're confusing everything again, the reproductions before training and possible downstream uses. The downstream uses can potentially be non-expressive. If it was entirely non-expressive, it wouldn't fall under Copyright and there wouldn't have been Fair Use analysis needed.
-
Judge Alsup’s Copyright Analysis Better Than Judge Chhabria’s Approach
By
–
From that perspective, Judge Alsup did a much better job. He identified and pointed out the overwhelming number of reproductions (under Copyright law) and conducted his a Fair Use analysis trying to break them down separately. Judge Chhabria was much worse technically.