AI Dynamics

Global AI News Aggregator

About

@akshay_pachaar

  • Claude Skills Context Engineering: 3-Layer System for Hundreds of Skills
    Claude Skills Context Engineering: 3-Layer System for Hundreds of Skills

    Context engineering in Claude Skills is GENIUS! Skills use a 3-layer context management system that lets it use 100s of skills without hitting context limits. Here's how it works: > Layer 1: Main Context – Always loaded, it contains the project configuration. > Layer 2: Skill Metadata – Comprises only the YAML frontmatter, about 2-3 lines (< 200 tokens). > Layer 3: Active Skill Context – SKILL. md files and associated documentation are loaded as needed. Supporting files like scripts and templates aren't pre-loaded but accessed directly when in use, consuming zero tokens. This architecture supports hundreds of skills without breaching context limits. The article below is a complete guide to ๐—–๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—จ๐——๐—˜.๐—บ๐—ฑ, hooks, skills, agents, and permissions, and how to set them up properly. Akshay ๐Ÿš€ (@akshay_pachaar) x.com/i/article/203496196714โ€ฆ โ€” https://nitter.net/akshay_pachaar/status/2035341800739877091#m

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar, 2026-04-03 08:07 UTC

  • Claude Code Unpacked: Complete Visual Walkthrough of 500k-Line Codebase

    Claude Code Unpacked! Visual walkthrough of the entire 500k-line leaked codebase. What happens when you type a message: – the agent loop – 50+ tools – multi-agent orchestration – unreleased features Want to understand the internals or build your own agent harness? start here:

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar, 2026-04-02 13:36 UTC

  • Plan-Execute-Verify: The AI Coding Loop for Faster Shipping
    Plan-Execute-Verify: The AI Coding Loop for Faster Shipping

    AI coding has a cheat code. It's not a tool, a model, or a better prompt template. It's a shift in how you structure the work. Most developers write one big prompt, hit enter, and hope for the best. When the output isn't right, they describe the problem, the AI "fixes" it, and a new problem shows up. Three rounds later, they're further from where they started. The developers who ship fastest never ask the AI to do everything at once. They run every task through a simple loop: ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป โ†’ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ โ†’ ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜† It starts with the ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป. Before the AI writes a single line of code, define the goal and constraints for just the next step. Not the whole feature, just the next piece. Even better, ask the AI to reason through the approach first. You catch bad assumptions before they become bad code. Then you ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ. Let the AI generate, but keep the scope tight. Not "build the entire auth system." Instead: "Add JWT verification middleware that reads from the Authorization header and returns 401 on expired tokens." Then you ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜†. Review the diffs. Run the tests. Give specific, actionable feedback. "That's wrong" is a terrible prompt. "The middleware should return 401, not 403, and check the Authorization header instead of X-Token" gives the AI everything it needs to course-correct in one shot. ๐—ฉ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜€. ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ. Then you go back to Plan and repeat. This works because AI is excellent at small, well-defined tasks and unreliable at large, ambiguous ones. The mental shift: you're not trying to write the perfect prompt. You're building a rhythm of small, verifiable steps that works the same way across any tool. Terminal agent, IDE copilot, browser-based builder. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜. ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐˜€. ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜€. The article below covers Vibe coding best practices with hands-on examples. Do check it out. Akshay ๐Ÿš€ (@akshay_pachaar) x.com/i/article/203930514901โ€ฆ โ€” https://nitter.net/akshay_pachaar/status/2039326670797369346#m

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar, 2026-04-02 07:40 UTC

  • Onyx’s Superior Data Indexing vs Claude’s MCP Connectors

    Been using this over the past few weeks and I noticed that the connectors are built far better than what I found in Claude. Essentially, unlike Claude's MCP connectors that query your tools at runtime, Onyx actually indexes and continuously syncs with internal data. So when I

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar,

  • Convergence Toward Continual Learning and Self-Evolving Systems

    things are converging towards continual learning and self-evolving systems.

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar,

  • MiniMax M2.7: First AI That Self-Improves Without Retraining

    The first AI that improves without retraining. (it rewrites its own agent harness) Every developer I know has one thing in common: they obsess over their setup. The terminal, the scripts, the shortcuts. They don't just write code. They constantly refine how they work. The code gets better because the environment gets better. MiniMax just released M2.7, and I think the most interesting thing about it isn't a benchmark number. It's the fact that M2.7 improves its own agent harness. Autonomously. Let's break this down: When you run an AI agent today, it operates inside a "harness." Think of it as the agent's operating environment: the skills it can invoke, the tools it can call, its memory, and the rules it follows. Normally, a human engineer builds this harness, and the agent operates within it. The harness stays fixed. M2.7 treats its harness as something it can rewrite. Here's what the loop looks like: – The agent runs a task and analyzes where things went wrong – It plans changes to its own scaffold: skills, MCPs, memory – It applies those changes, runs evaluations against a benchmark – It compares the results and decides whether to keep or revert – It writes self-criticism into memory so the next round starts smarter Then it loops back and does it again. And again. Think of it like a developer who finishes a project, writes a retrospective, restructures their workflow based on what they learned, and shows up the next day with a better setup. Except the developer here is the model itself. MiniMax ran this self-optimization loop for over 100 rounds internally. Along the way, the model discovered things on its own: it systematically searched for optimal sampling parameters (temperature, penalties), wrote workflow-specific guidelines for itself (like automatically checking for the same bug pattern in other files after a fix), and even added loop detection to avoid getting stuck. No human had to tell it to do any of this. They also tested this in a more controlled setting. They had M2.7 compete in 22 ML competitions from OpenAI's MLE Bench Lite. Each trial ran for 24 hours, fully autonomous. After each iteration, the agent wrote a memory file and performed self-criticism, feeding those insights into the next round. With every round, the ML models it trained achieved higher medal rates. The best run earned 9 gold medals. I've summarized the self-evolving architecture in the graphic below. The reason I find this compelling: this isn't about making a smarter model. It's about making a model that makes itself smarter. The weights never change. What changes is the system around it: better skills, better memory, better workflow rules. And that distinction matters because it means the improvement loop can run continuously without any retraining. We're entering a phase where agents don't just follow instructions. They redesign their own playbook. If you want to learn more, I've shared a link to their official blog post in the next tweet.

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar, 2026-03-31 13:07 UTC

  • Anatomy of the .claude/ folder structure explained

    Anatomy of the .claude/ folder: nitter.net/akshay_pachaar/status/โ€ฆ Akshay ๐Ÿš€ (@akshay_pachaar) x.com/i/article/203496196714โ€ฆ โ€” https://nitter.net/akshay_pachaar/status/2035341800739877091#m

    โ†’ View original post on X โ€” @akshay_pachaar, 2026-03-30 13:15 UTC