Yes I think we are. You seem to think that the fact that models are open technologies that can be used for both good & bad is a bad thing. But I've pointed out before that the fact they're universal computing devices has to be accepted as a premise. https://
fast.ai/posts/2023-11-
07-dislightenment.html
…
SAFETY
-
Open AI Models Universal Computing Devices Ethics Debate
By
–
-
Language Models Fine-Tuned Feedback Show Less Public Opinion Bias
By
–
Our latest policy brief highlights a quantitative framework that evaluates bias in language models. One key takeaway? Language models fine-tuned with human feedback were less representative of public opinion than models that were not fine-tuned. Read more: https://
stanford.io/3LXLCWI -
AI Regulation Versus Innovation: A Mutual Exclusivity Question
By
–
Does AI need more Regulation or more innovation? Is it mutually exclusive?
— Louis-François Bouchard 🎥🤖 (@Whats_AI) 13 octobre 2023
Learn more in the full podcast episode on my channel or all streaming platforms: https://t.co/IVfxsm2X2E#ai #innovation #whatsai #artificialintelligence #openai #chatgpt pic.twitter.com/9wzKX8foeYDoes AI need more Regulation or more innovation? Is it mutually exclusive? Learn more in the full podcast episode on my channel or all streaming platforms: https://
youtu.be/APpB0lH8YLE?si
=n45c-ou803PZavcV
… #ai #innovation #whatsai #artificialintelligence #openai #chatgpt -
Reading Nanosystems and reconsidering Superintelligence
By
–
I have been meaning to read Nanosystems — I just ordered a copy. I did read Superintelligence, both before I started on AI, and again this year, but I didn’t find it compelling either time.
-
Adversarial Examples Research: From Neural Net Skepticism
By
–
Remember when writing papers on adversarial examples to say neural nets don't work was the trend at one point, not too long ago
-
Rodney Brooks on Missy Cummings and Self-Driving Car Safety Criticism
By
–
A piece on my good friend @missy_cummings (suspended on X–you get to guess at why), F-18 fighter pilot, former MIT and Duke professor, and critic of self driving car companies' analyses of their own safety:
-
Consider First Second Third Degree Impacts of AI Advocacy
By
–
This is complex and difficult. Consider in detail the first, second, and third degree impacts of what you advocate. Then remember, first do no harm.
-
Interventions in AI Safety May Increase Fragility and Instability
By
–
Please stop saying ostensibly harmless. It's a strawman and strawmen are unhelpful. I understand your desire for humanity to take a breath, but all interventions I'm aware of that are designed to make that happen seem more likely to increase fragility and instability.
-
Democratized AI Power Versus Corporate Competition: Safety Question
By
–
It requires no such assumption. It is a question of power. Do you want the greatest power in the world to be in competition amongst profit seeking companies, or do you want it democratised? Which is safer?
-
Taiwan’s Chip Dominance: Critical Infrastructure for AI Hardware
By
–
Taiwan produces 40% of all processor chips and 90% of the world’s most advanced chips. War must remain unthinkable