You are claiming something exists. As with Bertrand Russell's teapot, the burden of proof is on you.
So far, it's just been sci-fi, scary sci-fi, but sci-fi nonetheless. A technology is not unsafe merely because of the possibility of doing it wrong.
A technology is safe because
SAFETY
-
Burden of Proof in AI Safety Claims and Technology Risk
By
–
-
Distill Whisper Reduces Hallucination Errors in Long Audio Transcription
By
–
Distill Whisper exhibits fewer 'hallucination errors' in transcribing long audio, crucial for customer service and accessibility. Its detailed training underscores the efforts to enhance AI efficiency.
-
Superhuman AI Emergence: Progressive Development Toward Advanced Systems
By
–
The emergence of superhuman AI will not be an event. Progress is going to be progressive.
It will start with systems that can learn how the world works, like baby animals.
Then we'll have machines that are objective driven and that satisfy guardrails.
Then, we'll have machines -
Meta’s FAIR Lab Marks 10 Years of Fundamental AI Research
By
–
Nice segment on CBS about AI research for the 10th anniversary of Meta's Fundamental AI Research lab (FAIR): the necessity of open research, AI risks and benefits, the future, AI assistants and domestic robots.
-
Existential Anxiety in AI Development and Society
By
–
definitely some sort of existential anxiety rooted in there
-
AI Bots Flooding Market: Society Faces Persuasion Problem
By
–
This is going to be a problem for society. Not just this company / app, but the onslaught of very persuasive AI bots that are going to flood the market and impact people’s relationships and behavior. https://t.co/5wrgQZ1o2Q
— Paul Roetzer (@paulroetzer) 16 décembre 2023This is going to be a problem for society. Not just this company / app, but the onslaught of very persuasive AI bots that are going to flood the market and impact people’s relationships and behavior.
-
AI Safety Requires Regulation Not Individual Defense
By
–
The audio was bad. I vaguely heard that he took a shot at me but couldn't understand what he was saying and hence could not respond.
His "good guy with a gun" analogy is false.
The correct analogy is laws and police: the defense against a bad guy with AI is not a random good guy -
Stanford Researcher Proposes Ethical Framework for Autonomous Vehicles
By
–
Driverless cars faced major setbacks in 2023. The co-director of the Center for Automotive Research @Stanford has an idea for designing more ethical self-driving vehicles.
-
AI Toy Pricing and Child Safety Concerns Emerge
By
–
Yeah, $99 seems like a fairly reasonable price for something like this. It also has me thinking of Aibo from CES 2018 that was a whopping $2,899! I'll be very curious to hear what privacy and child safety advocates think about these AI toys when they're available for testing…