A Thiel-backed platform to serve people who feel “misrepresented in the media”. Great piece about a wild idea. Imagine being rated a good journalist by an LLM for divulging sensitive source information to this startup, and being downgraded for protecting anonymity..
REGULATION
-

Stanford AI Index 2026: Data on AI Development and Policy Impact
By
–
Happening now: @StanfordHAI and @BrookingsInst are co-hosting a conversation on the #AIIndex2026 – what the latest data says about AI development, adoption, and real-world impact. Tune in and follow along: https://
brookings.edu/events/data-ga
p-ai-policy-stanford-ai-index/
… -
AI Backlash Prediction From Year Ago Appears On Track
By
–
Prediction from a year ago about AI backlash that looks to be on track:
-
Removable Media Security Policy Gaps and Threat Coverage
By
–
If your removable media policy only mentions USB drives, what percentage of actual threats does it miss?
-
Google’s Privacy Concerns in AI Development Meetings
By
–
Yeah. Gotta start somewhere. I'm sure the meetings about privacy are extraordinary inside Google.
-
USB Device Security: Expanding Scrutiny Beyond Storage
By
–
Any device that connects to a USB port, including keyboards, diagnostic tools, and personal phones, should fall under the same scrutiny as storage devices.
-
MSL Publishes Preparedness Reports for Advanced AI Models
By
–
As we develop more capable models at the frontier, MSL is committed to safety and preparedness for AI. To demonstrate this commitment, we will be publishing preparedness reports for our models, in line with our new Advanced AI Scaling Framework. See our Muse Spark report below:
-
Political Leadership and Global Destruction Concerns
By
–
In America we just put those men in power and have them destroy the world. https://t.co/5nSINerZuC
— Bojan Tunguz (@tunguz) 15 avril 2026In America we just put those men in power and have them destroy the world.
-
Open-Source AI Security Narratives: Beyond Simplistic Arguments
By
–
Weird how some people always target open-source in AI! First it was:
“Open-source AI will destroy the world” (spoiler: it didn't and it won't)
Now:
“Open-source is a cybersecurity threat because of AI” Both narratives are far too simplistic. The truth is that the exact same -
Internal AI Models Far Ahead of Public Releases
By
–
We don't have Mythos. The internal models of Google, OpenAI and Anthropic are substantially ahead of what the public gets to use. The important question is whether dissemination stops.
