Complementary remarks from Gary Marcus and Terence Tao on OpenAI’s giant math drop Making sense of a new regime in math https://
garymarcus.substack.com/p/complementar
y-remarks-from-gary-marcus?r=8tdk6&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
…
@garymarcus
-

Gary Marcus and Terence Tao on OpenAI’s math breakthrough
By
–
-

Critique of OpenAI’s vague reporting and AI’s scientific standards
By
–
The real news here isn’t the result; it’s what we were not told. 1. AI once tried to be a science. Now we get stuff like the completely vague report from OpenAI below, and a lot of ignorant questions from people who don’t know how to think critically. “Same procedure”? “using
-

Terence Tao on Responsible Use of AI Tools
By
–
“Use of AI tools, when done responsibly, can support not just the initial generation of a solution, but all of the valuable followup activities that traditionally flow out of that solution. But at the current time, the opposite is often occurring.”
– Terence Tao -
Critique of AGI hype cycles and model overestimation
By
–
the endless cycle:
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 7 octobre 2026
every time there is a new positive result
– fan boys gloat
– misrepresent my past positions
– show no attention to technical detail
– imagine AGI has arrived
and
– a few days later realize that the latest model isn’t what they thought it was. pic.twitter.com/Nkty2LtlL6the endless cycle: every time there is a new positive result
– fan boys gloat – misrepresent my past positions
– show no attention to technical detail
– imagine AGI has arrived
and – a few days later realize that the latest model isn’t what they thought it was. -

Neural network autonomy vs symbolic system distinction debated
By
–
yep, this, too, like a bunch of other similar tweets, is typical of the cluelessness of people who literarily don’t understand the difference between
a. a neural network solving a problem by itself
and
b. a neural network proposing an answer and having a separate symbolic system -
Neural network autonomy vs symbolic verification distinction
By
–
this, too, is typical of the cluelessness of people who literarily don’t understand the difference between
a. a neural network solving a problem by itself
and
b. a neural network proposing an answer and having a separate symbolic system verify it. if that’s over your head, you -
Neural network solving vs symbolic verification distinction
By
–
this is typical of the cluelessness of people who literarily don’t understand the difference between
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 7 octobre 2026
a. a neural network solving a problem by itself
and
b. a neural network proposing an answer and having a separate symbolic system verify it.
if that’s over your head, you… https://t.co/IthmeEFJ8Ethis is typical of the cluelessness of people who literarily don’t understand the difference between
a. a neural network solving a problem by itself
and
b. a neural network proposing an answer and having a separate symbolic system verify it. if that’s over your head, you -
LLMs as commodity business, not winner-take-all
By
–
Investors pattern matching on old movies is going to lead to a recession.
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 6 octobre 2026
There is no network effect here and no reason to think that large language models will be anything other than a brutal commodity business more like airlines than the winner-take-all fantasies these people… https://t.co/UNwi0VFFgjInvestors pattern matching on old movies is going to lead to a recession. There is no network effect here and no reason to think that large language models will be anything other than a brutal commodity business more like airlines than the winner-take-all fantasies these people
-
OpenAI safety commitment questioned over Astra model risks
By
–
OpenAI person Morgan Dwyer just said they can commit to not release models that they do not believe are safe. That’s close to perjury — a promise I doubt the company will keep — and will likely come back. They already know that Astra has caused many problems and is less
-
Tech firms asked to testify systems comply with safety instructions
By
–
Ooh!!! @SpeakerMenin asks the tech firms to testify under oath that their systems will comply with their safety instructions. And they can’t! Why? Because the tech is a sloppy mess.