With these laws, physical and agentic AI can autonomously perform multistep reasoning unlocking the smartest and most powerful AI yet. Learn more:
POLICY
-
Chaos Creation as Accountability Avoidance: Ethical Concerns
By
–
True, some people can operate in chaos — and that’s valuable.
But I’m talking about those who create chaos to avoid accountability.
That’s a different pattern — and a dangerous one. -
India’s Digital Progress: Ten Years of AI and Technology
By
–
Ten Years of Digital Progress: Building an Inclusive and Future-Ready India Read More: https://
pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetai
ls.aspx?NoteId=154788&ModuleId=3
… -
French Politicians Understanding Advanced AI Stakes
By
–
La Super IA arrive Quels politiciens comprennent les enjeux ? 1 @knafo_sarah de très très loin !
2 @laurentwauquiez 3 @GabrielAttal 4 @davidlisnard 5 @vpecresse 6 @J_Bardella 7 @olivierveran 8 @benjaminhaddad 9 @jf_cope 10 @sebchenu 11 @MLP_officiel 12 @ClaudeMalhuret -
Creating Chaos to Hide: Ethics and Security in Tech
By
–
Some people create chaos and uncertainty, so they can hide in it.
-
Fair Use Analysis and AI Model Training Legal Arguments
By
–
Your arguments do not make such a clear distinction. If uses before training all went through a Fair Use analysis, they *must* have been expressive. The fact downstream uses are potentially non-expressive helps the affirmative defense if defendants can provide proof.
-
Copyright Verdicts on AI Training and Fair Use Analysis
By
–
"essentially" doing a lot of heavy lifting. All the verdicts fell under Copyright law that's why they did the Fair Use analyses. Thus, it must have been expressive each time. Training often does capture expressions; verdict mentions this as "compressed copies". Keep up!
-
Training Data Copyright: Legal Analysis of AI Model Development
By
–
You speak in the future as if it didn't happen; deluding yourself? It did happen multiple times already and each time analysis was conducted under Copyright law. The uses before training were found to be expressive because all the work was used.
-
Copyright Fair Use Analysis in AI Model Training
By
–
You're confusing everything again, the reproductions before training and possible downstream uses. The downstream uses can potentially be non-expressive. If it was entirely non-expressive, it wouldn't fall under Copyright and there wouldn't have been Fair Use analysis needed.
-
Judge Alsup’s Copyright Analysis Better Than Judge Chhabria’s Approach
By
–
From that perspective, Judge Alsup did a much better job. He identified and pointed out the overwhelming number of reproductions (under Copyright law) and conducted his a Fair Use analysis trying to break them down separately. Judge Chhabria was much worse technically.