LLMS

–

10 March 2026 1h33

still more science showing that generative ai models are harmfully sycophantic

→ View original post on X — @datachaz

Claude Code Integration for Automated Code Review Management

By

@datachaz

–

10 March 2026 0h59

Code Review ships with: → repo-level controls
→ monthly spend caps
→ an analytics dashboard so engineering and security teams stay in charge. … and Claude never stamps a PR! Approval stays human.

→ View original post on X — @linusekenstam

Debate: Will AI eliminate need for human code review?

By

@linusekenstam

–

10 March 2026 0h51

This is so true.

Also devs thinking that vibe-coded or agentic coded solutions will need more humans to oversee and correct are 100% missing the plot.

the machines are making less and less sloppy code, and we can expect the code to become so good, humans not needed. https://t.co/bKlbyXuqba
— Linus ✦ Ekenstam (@LinusEkenstam) 9 mars 2026

This is so true. Also devs thinking that vibe-coded or agentic coded solutions will need more humans to oversee and correct are 100% missing the plot. the machines are making less and less sloppy code, and we can expect the code to become so good, humans not needed.

Investment in LLM Training Data

By

–

10 March 2026 0h46

sure but he put his money on training data for LLMs.

→ View original post on X — @datachaz

Anthropic Introduces Automated AI Agent Code Review for Claude Code

By

@datachaz

–

10 March 2026 0h43

🚨 Anthropic just dropped Code Review for Claude Code, and it just flipped the script on code reviews.

AI agents hunting bugs in parallel?

Yes please!

When a PR opens, Claude doesn't just scan the code.

It sends out multiple agents to find, cross-verify, and rank severities… pic.twitter.com/Yk2x4pCGS8
— Charly Wargnier (@DataChaz) 9 mars 2026

Anthropic just dropped Code Review for Claude Code, and it just flipped the script on code reviews. AI agents hunting bugs in parallel? Yes please! When a PR opens, Claude doesn't just scan the code. It sends out multiple agents to find, cross-verify, and rank severities

→ View original post on X — @bcherny

Test Time Compute and Subagents: Optimizing AI Results

By

@bcherny

–

10 March 2026 0h34

Roughly, the more tokens you throw at a coding problem, the better the result is. We call this test time compute. One way to make the result even better is to use separate context windows. This is what makes subagents work, and also why one agent can cause bugs and another

→ View original post on X — @askalphaxiv

Introducing GPT 5.4 for Research Paper Analysis and Contextual Queries

By

@askalphaxiv

–

10 March 2026 0h08

Introducing GPT 5.4 for understanding research papers 🚀

Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references pic.twitter.com/WmWJDoK5kf
— alphaXiv (@askalphaxiv) 9 mars 2026

Introducing GPT 5.4 for understanding research papers Highlight any section of a paper to ask questions and “@” other papers for quick context, comparisons, and benchmark references

Gary Marcus Criticizes Yann LeCun’s Glorification in AI Debate

By

–

09 March 2026 22h39

my contempt originates in the kind of behavior I discussed here: https://
open.substack.com/pub/garymarcus
/p/the-false-glorification-of-yann-lecun?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
…

9 March 2026

Gary Marcus Criticizes Yann LeCun’s Glorification in AI Discourse

By

–

09 March 2026 22h38

see eg https://
open.substack.com/pub/garymarcus
/p/the-false-glorification-of-yann-lecun?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
…, though it needs to be updated (again)