#AI Should Belong to Workers
by @imravikumars @time Learn more: https://
bit.ly/47w8HuK #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #ML
ETHICS
-

AI Should Belong to Workers
By
–
-

Agentic AI: Execution vs. True Decision-Making Capability
By
–
When you ask an agentic AI to implement your design… it executes perfectly. The gap: judgment and context. Execution is solved. Judgment and context aren’t. Agentic systems can act autonomously. But they don’t always understand what matters… or why. This is where things start to matter. So here’s the real question: Are we building agents that act… or systems that can truly decide? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #AgenticAI #FutureOfWork #Innovation Credits: Ralph
→ View original post on X — @pascal_bornet, 2026-04-05 05:00 UTC
-
Commission-Based Trading: Ethics and User Protection
By
–
Earn thru commission is a decent living. If they trade against their users, it not decent
-
AI Tools Transform Family Healthcare Decision-Making During Crisis
By
–
This isn’t an edge case. From anonymized U.S. ChatGPT data, we are seeing: • ~2M weekly messages on health insurance • ~600K weekly messages from people living in “hospital deserts” (30 min drive to nearest hospital) • 7 out of 10 msgs happen outside clinic hours Simon Smith (@_simonsmith) I’ve been critical of OpenAI lately, but for the past three weeks my family has been dealing with a health issue with my dad, and a ChatGPT shared project with live document syncing has been essential to organizing and understanding everything happening. Me, my four siblings, my mom, and my dad have faced an onslaught of information from various doctors and nurses, which we’ve captured in hundreds of text messages and documents and scans and you name it. ChatGPT has helped us collect this information in a single place, make sense of it, and interrogate it to make the most informed decisions possible. Also, credit where due: Claude played an important role as well, by ingesting iMessages and synthesizing summarizes from them to upload to ChatGPT, as well as by extracting text from a bunch of HEIC document scans. I think those of us, like me, excited at AI’s potential get frustrated when we can see issues so clearly, like ChatGPT’s bad design skills, and Claude’s increasing instability and confusing usage consumption. But at times like this I’m reminded of how incredible this technology already is, letting me and my family make sense and act on hundreds of pieces of information, empowering us in the face of a disjointed and fragmented healthcare system. — https://nitter.net/_simonsmith/status/2040539824034115676#m
→ View original post on X — @jeremyphoward, 2026-04-05 01:43 UTC
-
AI’s Ambitions Exceed Its Current Capabilities
By
–
AI is the field whose reach exceeds its grasp.
→ View original post on X — @pmddomingos, 2026-04-05 00:39 UTC
-
AI Training Progression: From Imitation to Superiority
By
–
Pre-training: imitate humans Post-training: please humans Inference: beat humans
→ View original post on X — @pmddomingos, 2026-04-05 00:06 UTC
-
Critical Human Moments in AI-Driven Customer Experience
By
–
Human Moments That Matter in an AI‑Driven Customer Experience gartner.com/en/podcasts/thinkcast [Translated from EN to English]
→ View original post on X — @craigbrownphd, 2026-04-05 00:01 UTC
-
Personal Wikipedia: User-Controlled AI Personalization via Files
By
–
Farzapedia, personal wikipedia of Farza, good example following my Wiki LLM tweet.
— Andrej Karpathy (@karpathy) 4 avril 2026
I really like this approach to personalization in a number of ways, compared to "status quo" of an AI that allegedly gets better the more you use it or something:
1. Explicit. The memory artifact… https://t.co/omsJsy8MXqFarzapedia, personal wikipedia of Farza, good example following my Wiki LLM tweet. I really like this approach to personalization in a number of ways, compared to "status quo" of an AI that allegedly gets better the more you use it or something: 1. Explicit. The memory artifact is explicit and navigable (the wiki), you can see exactly what the AI does and does not know and you can inspect and manage this artifact, even if you don't do the direct text writing (the LLM does). The knowledge of you is not implicit and unknown, it's explicit and viewable. 2. Yours. Your data is yours, on your local computer, it's not in some particular AI provider's system without the ability to extract it. You're in control of your information. 3. File over app. The memory here is a simple collection of files in universal formats (images, markdown). This means the data is interoperable: you can use a very large collection of tools/CLIs or whatever you want over this information because it's just files. The agents can apply the entire Unix toolkit over them. They can natively read and understand them. Any kind of data can be imported into files as input, and any kind of interface can be used to view them as the output. E.g. you can use Obsidian to view them or vibe code something of your own. Search "File over app" for an article on this philosophy. 4. BYOAI. You can use whatever AI you want to "plug into" this information – Claude, Codex, OpenCode, whatever. You can even think about taking an open source AI and finetuning it on your wiki – in principle, this AI could "know" you in its weights, not just attend over your data. So this approach to personalization puts *you* in full control. The data is yours. In Universal formats. Explicit and inspectable. Use whatever AI you want over it, keep the AI companies on their toes! 🙂 Certainly this is not the simplest way to get an AI to know you – it does require you to manage file directories and so on, but agents also make it quite simple and they can help you a lot. I imagine a number of products might come out to make this all easier, but imo "agent proficiency" is a CORE SKILL of the 21st century. These are extremely powerful tools – they speak English and they do all the computer stuff for you. Try this opportunity to play with one. Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸 (@FarzaTV) This is Farzapedia. I had an LLM take 2,500 entries from my diary, Apple Notes, and some iMessage convos to create a personal Wikipedia for me. It made 400 detailed articles for my friends, my startups, research areas, and even my favorite animes and their impact on me complete with backlinks. But, this Wiki was not built for me! I built it for my agent! The structure of the wiki files and how it's all backlinked is very easily crawlable by any agent + makes it a truly useful knowledge base. I can spin up Claude Code on the wiki and starting at index.md (a catalog of all my articles) the agent does a really good job at drilling into the specific pages on my wiki it needs context on when I have a query. For example, when trying to cook up a new landing page I may ask: "I'm trying to design this landing page for a new idea I have. Please look into the images and films that inspired me recently and give me ideas for new copy and aesthetics". In my diary I kept track of everything from: learnings, people, inspo, interesting links, images. So the agent reads my wiki and pulls up my "Philosophy" articles from notes on a Studio Ghibli documentary, "Competitor" articles with YC companies whose landing pages I screenshotted, and pics of 1970s Beatles merch I saved years ago. And it delivers a great answer. I built a similar system to this a year ago with RAG but it was ass. A knowledge base that lets an agent find what it needs via a file system it actually understands just works better. The most magical thing now is as I add new things to my wiki (articles, images of inspo, meeting notes) the system will likely update 2-3 different articles where it feels that context belongs, or, just creates a new article. It's like this super genius librarian for your brain that's always filing stuff for your perfectly and also let's you easily query the knowledge for tasks useful to you (ex. design, product, writing, etc) and it never gets tired. I might spend next week productizing this, if that's of interest to you DM me + tell me your usecase! — https://nitter.net/FarzaTV/status/2040563939797504467#m
-
AI Users Show Dangerous Cognitive Surrender to Language Models
By
–
Please don’t be that guy with “minimal AI skepticism”. Techmeme (@Techmeme) Research across 1,372 participants and 9K+ trials details "cognitive surrender", where most subjects had minimal AI skepticism and accepted faulty AI reasoning (@kyleorl / Ars Technica) arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/r… techmeme.com/260404/p10#a260… 📥 Send tips! techmeme.com/contact — https://nitter.net/Techmeme/status/2040543965871788042#m
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-04 22:51 UTC
-

AI Empowering Citizens to Increase Government Transparency and Accountability
By
–
Something I've been thinking about – I am bullish on people (empowered by AI) increasing the visibility, legibility and accountability of their governments. Historically, it is the governments that act to make society legible (e.g. "Seeing like a state" is the common reference), but with AI, society can dramatically improve its ability to do this in reverse. Government accountability has not been constrained by access (the various branches of government publish an enormous amount of data), it has been constrained by intelligence – the ability to process a lot of raw data, combine it with domain expertise and derive insights. As an example, the 4000-page omnibus bill is "transparent" in principle and in a legal sense, but certainly not in a practical sense for most people. There's a lot more like it: laws, spending bills, federal budgets, freedom of information act responses, lobbying disclosures… Only a few highly trained professionals (investigative journalists) could historically process this information. This bottleneck might dissolve – not only are the professionals further empowered, but a lot more people can participate. Some examples to be precise: Detailed accounting of spending and budgets, diff tracking of legislation, individual voting trends w.r.t. stated positions or speeches, lobbying and influence (e.g. graph of lobbyist -> firm -> client -> legislator -> committee -> vote -> regulation), procurement and contracting, regulatory capture warning lights, judicial and legal patterns, campaign finance… Local governments might be even more interesting because the governed population is smaller so there is less national coverage: city council meetings, decisions around zoning, policing, schools, utilities… Certainly, the same tools can easily cut the other way and it's worth being very mindful of that, but I lean optimistic overall that added participation, transparency and accountability will improve democratic, free societies. (the quoted tweet is half-ish related, but inspired me to post some recent thoughts) Harry Rushworth (@Hrushworth) The British Government is a complicated beast. Dozens of departments, hundreds of public bodies, more corporations than one can count… Such is its complexity that there isn't an org chart for it. Well, there wasn't… Introducing ⚙️Machinery of Government⚙️ — https://nitter.net/Hrushworth/status/2040406616806179001#m