Crypto/web3 is still in the early innings, and needs clear regulations to provide an open pathway for startups to build constructive solutions, while protecting consumers and stamping out the harmful “casino” culture that has developed around crypto.
ETHICS
-
UK Advances Crypto Regulation With Blockchain-Focused Sandbox Approach
By
–
The UK is on the right path for crypto regulation:
Working with industry on unique attributes of blockchain tech
Laying a foundation for future blockchain apps
Innovative sandbox approach to regulation
Outcomes-based regulation
Consumer protection front-and-center -
Learning field-wide numbers versus individual company data
By
–
It's not that the number sounds impossible; but how does one learn a number for the whole field rather than, say, that one company you remember? Also, if there's companies which get gulled for that, you'd expect there to be more scammers soon who do nothing but I/O Copilot.
-
AI Companies Ban Model Outputs for Training While Using Online Content
By
–
OpenAI, Google & Anthropic ban the use of the generated output content from their AI models to train other AI models, under their terms-of-service. However, they’ve been using other online content for their own model training. They can’t have it both ways.
-
Bringing Consent to Artificial Intelligence Development
By
–
We need to bring consent to AI #AI #AIio #BigData #ML #NLU #Futureofwork @TopCyberNews @SpirosMargaris @MarshaCollier @MHiesboeck
@MHcommunicate @Fisher85M @MikeQuindazzi @NealSchaffer
http://
ow.ly/hT0K30svHUh -
UK Universities Accused of Aiding Iranian Drone Technology Development
By
–
Even though the UK has sanctions on Iran, researchers at a dozen UK universities "have helped the Iranian regime to develop sophisticated technology that can be used in its drone programme and fighter jets." What the beep. "Key pieces of research have been conducted by
-
Big Tech Manipulation and AI Future Control Concerns
By
–
"I would claim we are already manipulated by a machine. It consists of the corporate interests of a handful of companies that make vast profits on the back of our personal information." "Relying on Big Tech companies to tell us how this [AI] future should look is like turkeys
-
Expert positioning and government policy subtlety in AI debate
By
–
I don't think it's beneficial for experts to take such positions, nor for lawfirms to secure additional business, because the debate has moved beyond that. Even governments are issuing policy statements that have more subtlety to them:
-
Fair Use in AI: Legal risks and educational approaches
By
–
My own educational perspective has been instead "it's possible to do Fair Use legally, but it's by far the riskiest approach and there are the fewest benefits."
-
Rhetorical Tactics in AI Model Theory Debates
By
–
When arguing against this perspective, make sure you don't mention the idea that a model is a database, or that a model does compression, or you'll fall off the edge of this carefully crafted argument.