I've spoken to many people in these orgs and asked why they haven't advocated for exec liability. I'm sure you already know the answer.
ETHICS
-
Scientists Lack Risk Management Expertise for AI Safety
By
–
Whilst @geoffreyhinton is a *brilliant* scientist, scientists are *not* the people to teach us about risk management. The project manager for the Nuclear Information Project has already warned us about these "muddled analogies", leading to a "calorie-free media panic".
-
AI Regulation Congress Sam Altman OpenAI ChatGPT Risk
By
–
Here's the full article: https://
vox.com/future-perfect
/2023/7/3/23779794/artificial-intelligence-regulation-ai-risk-congress-sam-altman-chatgpt-openai
… -
Virology Education Accessibility and LLM Knowledge Restrictions
By
–
I have a family member studying virology. Everyone in the course is learning this forbidden knowledge that LLMs are not allowed to pass on. So why do we allow the teaching of virology, but do not allow an understanding of virology to be more accessible?
-
AI Safety Organizations Notably Absent from Research Signatories
By
–
It doesn't appear in the arxiv paper, but does appear (briefly) in the addendum. Interestingly, none of the usual AI Safety organizations appear as signatories to this.
-
Differential Risk Treatment in AI Harm Assessment
By
–
These seems premised on the idea that all things that could cause harm should be treated identically – is that correct? If so, I don't see how that is true. And if not, I don't understand what is being claimed.
-
AI Safety: Mental Stability Testing Before Powerful Technology Access
By
–
I don't have anything in mind, but since some people like you assimilate technology like AI and synthetic biology with powerful weapons, it would only seem logical to push the analogy: we don't put powerful weapons in the hands of anyone without testing their mental stability.
-
AI Design Philosophy: Enhancement Not Destruction
By
–
Well, that was kind of the idea behind the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine, but nevermind. AI is designed to make humanity smarter, not wipe out entire cities.
I fail to see how this analogy has any relevance. -
Does AI Regulation Increase or Decrease Extinction Risk?
By
–
Geoffrey do you think advocating for strong regulation will make human extinction more likely, or less likely? On what basis do you make that assessment?
-
AI Safety Policies May Undermine Protection Against Superintelligence
By
–
AI Safety advocates are *not* really taking seriously the possibility of AI super intelligence. If you do really think that this is a danger, their main policy recommendations may make us much *less* safe. I explain why in this discussion: