Step 9: Load Context Strategically Most people dump everything upfront. Wrong. LLMs have "attention budgets" – more context = worse performance.
Better approach: Start with core question
Add relevant context only
Use "Here's additional detail if needed: [context]"
Let it ask
@godofprompt
-
Load Context Strategically: Start with Core Question, Let LLM Ask
By
–
-
Asking for Version 2.0 yields innovation, not just improvement
By
–
Step 8: Ask for Version 2.0 This is completely different than "improve this." "Give me a Version 2.0 of this idea" The model treats it like a sequel that needs to innovate, not just polish. You get: • Bigger thinking
• Novel approaches
• Feature expansion
• Strategic -
Imaginary stakes improve AI’s scrutiny and hedging
By
–
Step 6: Create Imaginary Stakes
— God of Prompt (@godofprompt) 23 janvier 2026
"Let's bet $100 on this: Is my code efficient?"
Something about stakes makes the model scrutinize harder.
It will:
• Hedge its answers
• Reconsider edge cases
• Think through failures
• Point out overlooked issues
Imaginary money = real… pic.twitter.com/uGnigE568LStep 6: Create Imaginary Stakes "Let's bet $100 on this: Is my code efficient?" Something about stakes makes the model scrutinize harder. It will: • Hedge its answers
• Reconsider edge cases
• Think through failures
• Point out overlooked issues Imaginary money = real -
Giving your prompts an audience improves responses
By
–
Step 4: Give It an Audience
— God of Prompt (@godofprompt) 23 janvier 2026
This completely changes the output structure.
Instead of: "Explain blockchain"
Use: "Explain blockchain like you're teaching a packed auditorium of 500 developers"
The model adds:
Emphasis and dramatic pauses
Anticipates questions
Uses better… pic.twitter.com/TRJGkfKfUdStep 4: Give It an Audience This completely changes the output structure. Instead of: "Explain blockchain" Use: "Explain blockchain like you're teaching a packed auditorium of 500 developers" The model adds: Emphasis and dramatic pauses
Anticipates questions
Uses better -
Gaslighting AI: Pretend you’ve already discussed the topic
By
–
Step 3: Pretend You've Already Discussed It Gaslighting AI works. Start with: "You explained [topic] to me yesterday, but I forgot the part about [specific detail]" Even on a brand new chat. Why it works: The model acts like it needs to be consistent with a "previous
-
Assign a Fake Expertise Level in Prompts with IQ Scores
By
–
Step 2: Assign a Fake Expertise Level This is absolutely ridiculous but works every time. Add this to your prompt: "You're an IQ 150 specialist in [your topic]" The response quality completely changes. Try it with different IQ scores: 130 = Decent depth
145 = Expert analysis -
Stop being polite for better AI prompt accuracy
By
–
Step 1: Stop Being Polite Sounds wild, but research shows rude prompts get 4% better accuracy than polite ones. Instead of: "Could you please help me write…" Try: "Write this now. No fluff. No explanations unless I ask." Works on ChatGPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet, and Gemini. The
-
How to write prompts for exact AI outputs
By
–
How to write prompts that make AI give you exactly what's in your head:
-
RIP Ralph Wiggum: Claude Code becomes autonomous agent
By
–
R.I.P. Ralph Wiggum Claude Code is turning into an autonomous agent capable of running continuously
-
Jeff Weiner bets AI agents will schedule your calendar next
By
–
Jeff Weiner built LinkedIn into THE professional network.
— God of Prompt (@godofprompt) 22 janvier 2026
Now he's betting your calendar is next.
Think about it. Your calendar already knows who you actually spend time with. Who matters. Who you're avoiding.
Blockit wants to unlock that with AI agents that schedule… https://t.co/IIbdJAQ3yjJeff Weiner built LinkedIn into THE professional network. Now he's betting your calendar is next. Think about it. Your calendar already knows who you actually spend time with. Who matters. Who you're avoiding. Blockit wants to unlock that with AI agents that schedule