No, that is not L5. There may be some cities like that, especially ones designed from scratch, but that’s not L5. And it won’t help eg in NYC. Certainly possible in principle to be safer than humans, fully automated, and it probably will happen, I just doubt it will be soon.
@garymarcus
-
Bet on Global L5 AI Analysis by End 2029
By
–
Great. Sounds like we basically agree on criteria. You donate 5k to Doctors Without Borders if we don’t have that analysis for global L5 by 31 December 2029; if we do I will donate $5000 to a charity of your choice. deal assuming we can agree on wording?
-
Level 5 Autonomous Driving Definition Global Roads Without Steering Wheel
By
–
No that’s just more demos, and also restricted to US. True level 5 means you don’t need a steering wheel and the car takes you where you want to go around the globe (on conventional roads) without restriction. That’s how it is defined. Eg https://
d1v9sz08rbysvx.cloudfront.net/ricardo/media/
assets/rickin-pageimages/6-levels-automated-driving.jpg
… -
Level 5 autonomous vehicles: global deployment by 2030?
By
–
Game on. Will we have L5 driverless cars by end of decade, around the globe?
-
Autonomous Vehicle Safety Evaluation and Independent Agency Oversight
By
–
Most commutes, around the globe, really? I am willing to bracket regulatory issues and pulled over vehicles if we can agree on a way to evaluate safety that is some kind of independent agency that has access to data.
-
L5 AGI Safety Betting: Can We Achieve It by 2030?
By
–
You want to put money on (safe as humans) L5 by end of decade? @metaculus @MatthewJBar https://
x.com/realGeorgeHotz
/realGeorgeHotz/status/1591567145032368129
… -
Innate Priors Shape AI Learning: Evolution Over Minimalism
By
–
– you still need some prior to organize that infinite data and decide how to generalize from it
– the choice to minimize is an aesthetic choice, not a scientific one; evolution has clearly endowed many animals with significant priors (eg baby ibex climbing down a mountain). -
Strong innate priors in machine learning systems
By
–
that’s learning that the set of relevant cases is empty; it’s still a strong innate prior
-
BIG-Bench Benchmarks Face Validity Scrutiny for AGI Predictions
By
–
Trouble in BIG-Bench paradise? – @ErnestSDavis looks at 48 of the benchmarks within and finds problems with most: https://
cs.nyu.edu/~davise/Benchm
arks/BigBenchDiscussion.html
… – Many project AGI timelines based on performance on these benchmarks. If the benchmarks aren’t valid, consequent timelines are problematic