When you know how lawyers think, how PR departments work, it's more of a confirmation than them just owning it!
@alexjc
-
Non-profit accountability and investigation into disputed termination
By
–
If they reveal it, that opens up a can of words that he was fired for valid reasons that should be explored. As a non-profit they have responsibilites and it may well (should) result in a public investigation.
-
U.S. EU AI Regulation Framework Comparison Legal Standards
By
–
The U.S. doesn't have law for databases that applies in Europe; here it would have been easier to explain to judges that models have similar benefits and responsibilities…
-
AI’s Non-Consensual Use of Artist Data Raises Ethical Concerns
By
–
Yeah, we are moving towards enlightenment one step at a time. In the meantime, let's completely destroy those artists' livelihoods, steal their data and violate their consent. That'll get us much further!
-
Market Monopoly and Military AI Technology Concealment Strategy
By
–
I bet you the opposite… They already cornered the market, no need for such games. They are hiding it because they can sell it to military, avoid public pressure for regulation, prevent others from trying to compete, etc.
-
Government accountability in AI policy decisions
By
–
Depends if you assume the government cares about people!
-
Fair Use and AI Training: Legal Arguments and Copyright Implications
By
–
Notice how this particular legal argument goes against what Anthropic is arguing. Fair Use implies it does fall under Copyright… What's missing from this analysis is that the determination of Fair Use depends on the application itself, whether it's harmful to rightsholders.
-
CEO Layoffs Preferred Over Salary Cuts Legal Concerns
By
–
Layoffs happening already. Cutting salaries can be harder to do legally, so layoffs are CEO's preferred solution…
-
LLM Output Filters and Copyright Compliance Deception
By
–
If their argument was true, they wouldn't need output filters for Copyrighted materials, but LLMs and proprietary services do… and thus they are lying to cover their tracks.
-
Claude Copyright Lawsuit: Training Data and Protected Expressions
By
–
This is easily disproven. Claude can output Copyrighted expressions and is being sued for it. Therefore, training wasn't "non-expressive" as the model cannot distinguish what is protected and what is not — everything is ingested. It inherently falls under Copyright.