Writers and Artists Need a Way to Label AI Use: Here’s What That Could Look Like
#AI #AIio #AIInnovation #ML #DataScience #Futureofwork @demishassabis @Ronald_vanLoon @TamaraMcCleary @geoffreyhinton @goodfellow_ian @jeffdean @erikbryn
SOCIETY
-
Writers and Artists Need a Way to Label AI Use
By
–
-
AI in 1997: As Big as Internet or Mobile, Still Early
By
–
My biggest takeaways from @benedictevans
: 1. We’re in 1997 for AI—it’s as big a deal as the internet or mobile, and only as big a deal as the internet or mobile. We’re at the stage where most stuff kind of doesn’t work yet, most of what people will build hasn’t been built, and -
Vibe shift: Soumith’s dream of personal AI realized by PewDiePie
By
–
just a small zoom out on the vibe shift: in Feb 2025 @soumithchintala was talking about his dream of personal, local, private agents, most people didn't believe him. it's June 2026 and @pewdiepie has just released his vibecoded @opencode wrapper that is a complete personal AI
-
AI experts’ thoughts dismissed in public opinion creation
By
–
At the epicenter of public opinion creation on AI, the thoughts of actual AI experts are dismissed. (Btw. Silicon Valley largely agrees with the concerns, Chris Olah is a good representative)
-
Against Generative AI: Is Art the Last Refuge of Our Humanity?
By
–
Against Generative AI: Is Art the Last Refuge of Our Humanity?
#AI #AIio #AIInnovation #ML #DataScience #Futureofwork @Scobleizer @AndrewYNg @drfeifei @KirkDBorne @fchollet @rowancheung @antgrasso -
Human imperfection compared to machine capabilities in various tasks
By
–
If we are so perfect, why are we so bad at arithmetics, computing integrals symbolically, playing chess, go, or poker?
Machines are already more "perfect" than us at these and many other tasks. (Also, why can we die from diseases if we are so perfect?) -
GStar Summit: When you think of AI, think of humanity
By
–
When you think of AI, also think of humanity. That was the main message of the GStar Summit on AI and humanity that I organized two days ago (as a break after Google I/O). For a long time, I have been deeply focused on advancing the capabilities of
-
Pope’s AI Insight vs. Hinton: We’re Creating Fiction, Not Beings
By
–
Weird how the Pope seems to understand AI better than @geoffreyhinton, but I am 100% with the Pope on this.
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 31 mai 2026
We are NOT creating beings. The Pope is right.
We are creating interactive fiction that is trained to predict the language of actual beings.
Those two are NOT the same.… https://t.co/1xXedkXGEzWeird how the Pope seems to understand AI better than @geoffreyhinton
, but I am 100% with the Pope on this. We are NOT creating beings. The Pope is right. We are creating interactive fiction that is trained to predict the language of actual beings. Those two are NOT the same. -
Moral dimension of making first-pass cognition historically cheap
By
–
There is, particularly, a moral dimension on “We will be able to make first-pass cognition available at a price point so low it is historically unachievable for any quantum of effort from a professional.”
-
What do we really want from AI? A hopeful question.
By
–
For a while now, I’ve been thinking about what really cuts through the barrage of noise about AI in the public domain. Because we’re human, it isn’t dire warnings about jobs or existential doom, but a hopeful, optimistic question – what do we really want from AI?