Mathematical methods and human thought in the age of AI Tanya Klowden, Terence Tao: https://
arxiv.org/abs/2603.26524 #ArtificialIntelligence
RESEARCH
-

Mathematical Methods and Human Thought in AI Age
By
–
-

Modern Time Series Analysis with R for Practical Forecasting
By
–
Modern Time Series Analysis with R: Practical Forecasting and Impact Estimation with Tidy, Reproducible Workflows! #BigData #Analytics #DataScience #AI #MachineLearning #IoT #IIoT #PyTorch #Python #RStats #TensorFlow #Java #JavaScript #ReactJS #GoLang #CloudComputing #Serverless
-

DeepSeek V4 Training Costs: Skepticism on Reported Figures
By
–
With the release of DeepSeek V4 imminent, it’s worth remembering that any headline numbers about its training costs should be taken with a massive grain of salt.
— Nina Schick (@NinaDSchick) 31 mars 2026
The claim that they trained their V3 model for just $6 million is like saying a transatlantic flight only costs the… pic.twitter.com/fnOIyINiewWith the release of DeepSeek V4 imminent, it’s worth remembering that any headline numbers about its training costs should be taken with a massive grain of salt. The claim that they trained their V3 model for just $6 million is like saying a transatlantic flight only costs the
-
Convergence Toward Continual Learning and Self-Evolving Systems
By
–
things are converging towards continual learning and self-evolving systems.
-

ICML2026 Introduces Family-Friendly Conference Support Initiatives
By
–
#ICML2026 supports parents attending the conference! – nursing infants and children 14 to 17 may attend the conference for free with their guardian – free childcare for children up to 13, while availability lasts — registration is open now!
→ View original post on X — @thegautamkamath, 2026-03-31 13:55 UTC
-
Anthropic Confirms Mythos Project to Fortune Magazine
By
–
mythos was confirmed by anthropic a week ago. Fortune reached out to them.
-
Molmo Point: AI Visual Grounding with Precise Spatial Pointing
By
–
Molmo Point: Teaching AI to Ground Language in Precise Visual Locations
— Satya Mallick (@LearnOpenCV) 31 mars 2026
In this episode of Artificial Intelligence: Papers and Concepts, we explore Molmo Point, an extension of multimodal AI that focuses on precise visual grounding enabling models to not just describe images,… pic.twitter.com/z1wpwyHwqUMolmo Point: Teaching AI to Ground Language in Precise Visual Locations In this episode of Artificial Intelligence: Papers and Concepts, we explore Molmo Point, an extension of multimodal AI that focuses on precise visual grounding enabling models to not just describe images, but accurately point to specific regions within them. Instead of treating images as whole scenes, Molmo Point trains models to connect language with exact spatial locations, bringing AI closer to how humans reference and interpret visual information. We break down why visual grounding has been a persistent challenge in vision–language models, how pointing mechanisms improve interaction and understanding, and what this means for applications like robotics, UI automation, and real-world task execution. If you’re interested in multimodal AI, spatial reasoning, or the future of AI systems that can both see and act, this episode explains why Molmo Point represents an important step toward more precise and actionable visual intelligence. Resources: Paper Link: allenai.org/papers/molmopoin… Interested in Computer Vision and AI consulting and product development services? Email us at contact@bigvision.ai or visit us at bigvision.ai
→ View original post on X — @learnopencv, 2026-03-31 13:30 UTC
-

Natural-Language Agent Harnesses: Making AI Agent Control Portable and Inspectable
By
–
Agent harnesses are too restrictive. That's because they're still designed as code. What if the harness itself were written in natural language and interpreted by an LLM at runtime? This research explores the idea. The work introduces Natural-Language Agent Harnesses (NLAHs), a structured natural-language representation that externalizes harness logic as a portable, executable artifact. Instead of scattering control flow across controller code, framework defaults, and tool adapters, NLAHs make contracts, roles, stage structure, state semantics, and failure taxonomies explicit and editable. An Intelligent Harness Runtime (IHR) places an LLM inside the runtime loop to interpret and execute these harnesses directly. Why does it matter? Harness design is increasingly decisive for agent performance, but it's buried in code that's hard to transfer, compare, or ablate. NLAHs make the orchestration layer a first-class scientific object. The practical implication: harnesses become portable across runtimes, composable across tasks, and directly inspectable by humans and models alike. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.25723 Learn to build effective AI agents in our academy: academy.dair.ai/
-

Meta-Harness: Automated System Achieves 6x Performance Improvement
By
–
NEW Stanford & MIT paper on Model Harnesses. Changing the harness around a fixed LLM can produce a 6x performance gap on the same benchmark. What if we automated harness engineering itself? The work introduces Meta-Harness, an agentic system that searches over harness code by exposing the full history through a filesystem. The proposer reads source code, execution traces, and scores from all prior candidates, referencing over 20 past attempts per step. On text classification, it improves over SOTA context management by 7.7 points while using 4x fewer tokens. On agentic coding, it outperforms all hand-engineered baselines on TerminalBench-2, scoring 37.6% versus Claude Code's 27.5%. This is a big deal! Here is why: The harness around a model often matters as much as the model itself. Meta-Harness shows that giving an optimizer rich access to prior experience, not just compressed scores, unlocks automated engineering that beats human-designed scaffolding. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.28052 Learn to build effective AI agents in our academy: academy.dair.ai/
-
MiniMax M2.7: First AI That Self-Improves Without Retraining
By
–
The first AI that improves without retraining. (it rewrites its own agent harness) Every developer I know has one thing in common: they obsess over their setup. The terminal, the scripts, the shortcuts. They don't just write code. They constantly refine how they work. The code gets better because the environment gets better. MiniMax just released M2.7, and I think the most interesting thing about it isn't a benchmark number. It's the fact that M2.7 improves its own agent harness. Autonomously. Let's break this down: When you run an AI agent today, it operates inside a "harness." Think of it as the agent's operating environment: the skills it can invoke, the tools it can call, its memory, and the rules it follows. Normally, a human engineer builds this harness, and the agent operates within it. The harness stays fixed. M2.7 treats its harness as something it can rewrite. Here's what the loop looks like: – The agent runs a task and analyzes where things went wrong – It plans changes to its own scaffold: skills, MCPs, memory – It applies those changes, runs evaluations against a benchmark – It compares the results and decides whether to keep or revert – It writes self-criticism into memory so the next round starts smarter Then it loops back and does it again. And again. Think of it like a developer who finishes a project, writes a retrospective, restructures their workflow based on what they learned, and shows up the next day with a better setup. Except the developer here is the model itself. MiniMax ran this self-optimization loop for over 100 rounds internally. Along the way, the model discovered things on its own: it systematically searched for optimal sampling parameters (temperature, penalties), wrote workflow-specific guidelines for itself (like automatically checking for the same bug pattern in other files after a fix), and even added loop detection to avoid getting stuck. No human had to tell it to do any of this. They also tested this in a more controlled setting. They had M2.7 compete in 22 ML competitions from OpenAI's MLE Bench Lite. Each trial ran for 24 hours, fully autonomous. After each iteration, the agent wrote a memory file and performed self-criticism, feeding those insights into the next round. With every round, the ML models it trained achieved higher medal rates. The best run earned 9 gold medals. I've summarized the self-evolving architecture in the graphic below. The reason I find this compelling: this isn't about making a smarter model. It's about making a model that makes itself smarter. The weights never change. What changes is the system around it: better skills, better memory, better workflow rules. And that distinction matters because it means the improvement loop can run continuously without any retraining. We're entering a phase where agents don't just follow instructions. They redesign their own playbook. If you want to learn more, I've shared a link to their official blog post in the next tweet.
→ View original post on X — @akshay_pachaar, 2026-03-31 13:07 UTC