REGULATION

→ View original post on X — @arthurmensch

Regulating AI Applications Over Algorithms: Public Domain Knowledge

By

@arthurmensch

–

01 November 2023 8h09

It may soon be a crime to compress public domain human knowledge into public domain matrices. We need to regulate the usage of AI in applications, not gradient descent

→ View original post on X — @ylecun

Meta and big tech caution in unstable legal landscape

By

@ylecun

–

01 November 2023 8h06

I agree. Same story with Meta.
In an unstable legal and political landscape, large companies have to be cautious.
Smaller companies, not so much.

Frontier Model Licensing Proposals Car Analogy Critique

By

–

01 November 2023 7h12

Your attempt to align frontier model licensing proposals with car licensing is confusing two things that happen to use the same words but are *totally* different. This is a lazy analogy.

Regulatory Capture Worsens AI Concerns Rather Than Solves

By

–

01 November 2023 7h02

Of course concerns are warranted. But regulatory capture is not a solution to those concerns. It makes them worse.

Knowledge Restrictions in AI: Ethics Versus Governance

By

–

01 November 2023 6h57

That's highly controversial, and attempts to minimize the spread of some kinds of knowledge have largely been consigned to history (and a handful of autocratic states).

Project Manager Nuclear Risks Expertise and Accountability Question

By

–

01 November 2023 5h46

The project manager for the Nuclear Information Project is outside the field of commenting on nuclear risks? You do realise that the quoted tweet is explicitly about that topic, right?

→ View original post on X — @soumithchintala

US Commerce Department Decision on Open Model Weights in 270 Days

By

@soumithchintala

–

01 November 2023 3h51

In 270 days, the Department of Commerce will determine whether they will allow open-weights or not. if you support open model weights and want something actionable to do, then figure out how to lobby your opinion to them.