Oh, come on, Max.
The kind of regulation @cedric_o was saying we need, and the kind of regulation he objects to in the EU AI Act, are completely different.
Of course, there is a need for regulations at the product level.
Such regulations already exist in many areas
REGULATION
-
Product-Level AI Regulation: EU AI Act Critique
By
–
-

Unpatched PLCs Pose Critical Vulnerabilities on OT Networks
By
–
Alarming findings in the 2023 Microsoft Digital Defense Report! Discover the shocking statistics about unpatched, highly vulnerable PLCs on OT networks. Read @aDolus_Inc
’s blog for the full scoop. https://
ow.ly/T7UM50Q6oWs #sponsored #adolus_ics #Cybersecurity #OTVulnerabilities -
Indigenous Languages Missing from LLM Development Discussions
By
–
As it is #NativeAmericanHeritageMonth I’d like to note that any discussion of @OpenAI or LLMs in general that doesn’t include how all indigenous (and other) languages will be included in any and all algorithms doesn’t honor vast portions of human culture, identity and rights.
-
Top Experts Identify Critical Tech Society Intersection Problems
By
–
Publication @techreview asked top people in their field, "What are the hardest problems at the intersection of technology and society that need more attention?" Read the answers from @NitaFarahany
, @doctorow
, @melindagates
, @TendaiChisowa https://
technologyreview.com/2023/11/01/108
1939/big-questions-problem-solving-bill-gates-jennifer-doudna-lina-khan/
… #sustainability -
IEEE Framework Prioritizes People and Planet in Responsible AI
By
–
Btw, here’s a paper on how to make this happen written by an amazing committee led by @milenapribic w/the glorious @baxterkb called “Prioritizing People and Planet as the Metrics for Responsible AI” – https://
standards.ieee.org/wp-content/upl
oads/2023/07/ead-prioritizing-people-planet.pdf
…. @carissa & @mmitchell_ai – welcome your thoughts. -
AI Regulation: Representation, Equity and Partnership Models
By
–
Two questions to ask re any regulation for AI – 1) Who’s not in the room? (Eg, women, marginalized or indigenous reps), and 2) Are our plans in a paradigm of domination (eg, competition) or partnership (eg, caregiving). Partnership is the only way forward for equity and joy.
-
Human-Centered AI Companion Design: Ethics and Data Control
By
–
And imagine the joy & innovation when human flourishing including mental health awareness is addressed at the outset of design so AI “companions” honor having all humans & their caregivers being able to access & control their data? This is moving “beyond risk and harms for AI.”
-
AI Data Centers: Community Engagement for Water Protection
By
–
For instance, re the use of water & LLMs – imagine the joy & innovation that will come from any AI company reporting how their plans for new data centers were created via community engagement including indigenous populations to ensure water is protected for generations to come.
-
Redefining AI Success: Ecological and Human Flourishing Over GDP
By
–
Agree with you both and would add we must talk about what we / society want as goals. Meaning, beyond “risks & harms” the world currently values – with GDP oriented metrics – productivity and profit. We need to prioritize ecological & human flourishing as new metrics for AI.
-

Bond Villain Tech: Corporate Greed Ignores Global Regulations
By
–
One of the earlier iterations, which DALL-E described thusly: This cartoon depicts a Bond villain-like character in a luxurious office, surrounded by screens showing global stock exchanges and casually ignoring a pile of legal documents from different countries.