9. Of course, there are some logistical issues. AIs can't run for president. But the solution is simple, and has already been tested in Japan, Denmark, Wyoming and other places: a human runs for office merely as a placeholder, and pledges to do whatever the AI says, like a
REGULATION
-
ChatGPT and AI Making Representative Democracy Obsolete
By
–
8. ChatGPT can make decisions by continuously taking input from millions of Americans and doing vast, complex inferences in real time. AI makes representative democracy obsolete: the representation is inside ChatGPT's head, and that works a lot better than self-serving
-
ChatGPT Control by Staff: Transparent Alternative to Human Politicians
By
–
7. Yes, ChatGPT will have to be prompted and steered by staffers and party members, who will be the ones really in control. But that's no different from Trump or Harris (or, even more, Biden). And at least it's transparent.
-
ChatGPT’s unprecedented political influence threatens democratic processes
By
–
4. ChatGPT can personally butter up every voter, every minute of the day. No human politician – no entire party machine – can match that. Democracy will never be the same once AI gets going.
-
Tech Expertise as Presidential Qualification: ChatGPT vs Trump Harris
By
–
3. Trump and Harris know nothing about tech, while ChatGPT knows everything. Tech is more important than ever these days – shouldn't we have a president who's deeply familiar with it, or even better, who is it?
-
Shadow AI and Gig Worker Legal Status Concerns
By
–
Hi @SabineVdL
, agree, definitely not for outsourcing core strengths. Also after reading the Forbes article you posted on Shadow AI, I think there is a lot of danger here as it is still not clear if a gig worker is considered legally as an employee or an independent contractor. -
Generative AI for Federal Government Efficiency and Deployment
By
–
How can generative AI help the federal government run more efficiently? Join us for a webinar with @Carahsoft to learn how DataRobot enables government teams to rapidly build, confidently govern, and securely deploy AI applications within a unified platform. Date: August
-
Big Tech Power Concentration Threatens US Talent Attraction
By
–
Having such power concentration in big tech companies would also create use social problems, which would further detract from US capability, including reducing their ability to attract the best talent.
-
China US AI Competition and Scientific Participation Impact
By
–
Greatly accelerate relative progress of China vs US. They would be able to fully participate in the global scientific community, whereas US would be hamstrung. Pre-meiji Japan thought that they would be best staying closed. It doesn't work great in practice.
-
Controversial AI Infrastructure Proposals and Regulatory Boundaries
By
–
This seems disingenuous to me. Isn't the whole point of this post meant to be that we all know exactly what's he's talking about? He's proposed in Time magazine bombing data centers, so that's within the Overton window. What possibly do you imagine he's talking about then?