If I built a car & said, “this vehicle was built using information that may be inaccurate regarding physics, safety, or environmental protections” I wouldn’t let it drive you or your family. Yet lots of people creating these tools want them to drive society knowing these errors.
POLICY
-
AI Tool Disclosure Standards: Beyond Mere Warnings
By
–
If I published a paper that says, “this paper may have inaccurate information about people, places or facts” the response from reviewers would be, “keep doing your homework & provide reliable resources.” Disclosure can’t be “this tool is crap but I told you.”
-
Cybersecurity Defense: Employee Training and Threat Intelligence
By
–
Grasping diverse cyber threats informs defense strategies. Employee training boosts response, turning weaknesses into assets. Recognizing attacker motivations refines defenses, especially in risky sectors. Tech investments & adaptability bolster resilience. Microblog @antgrasso
-
AI Risk Alarmism vs Economic Pragmatism and Regulation
By
–
Extreme AI risk alarmism will fail just as extreme climate alarmism never reached its goals, aside from a few absurd EU regulations. People choose a pragmatic middle ground, and greed and economic incentives always prevail.
-
AI Governance Discussion with CPOs from Microsoft, Google, Meta
By
–
Last week at @PrivacyPros' meeting in Boston, I joined the incredible Chief Privacy Officers from @Microsoft @Google and @Meta to discuss the importance of #AI governance. Listen to the discussion on @StrongReporter's podcast SHIFT podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
→ View original post on X — @strongreporter, 2023-11-11 22:58 UTC
-
US and China to Pledge Ban on AI in Autonomous Weapons
By
–
Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to pledge a ban on the use of Al in autonomous weapons today.
— AI Breakfast (@AiBreakfast) 11 novembre 2023
Probably for the best. pic.twitter.com/GJvnDpZ967Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to pledge a ban on the use of Al in autonomous weapons today. Probably for the best.
-
Corporate Governance Structure Effectiveness in Tech Questioned
By
–
I think that's a fair claim, although I'm not sure I agree. Governance and US corporate law is complex, and I'm somewhat skeptical this structure will turn out to be effective. But fingers crossed I'm wrong
-
Foundation Models Now Included in AI Regulation After Lobbying
By
–
Earlier this year it was totally changed, following lobbying, from a focus on high-risk applications to also covering "foundation models". So yes, I agree with what you say "many argue". That's also what I'm arguing.
-
OpenAI Must Better Accept Valid Criticism and Feedback
By
–
As you know, I'm a huge fan of OpenAI, and have very regularly defended the company against unfair criticism. However, I have noticed increasingly a failure to appreciate and accept valid criticism, which is concerning. Ability to reflect and learn is vital.
-
Balancing User Control and Responsible AI Model Deployment
By
–
Over time the plan is to give people more control, for the time being we have to do a lot of responsibility to ensure this technology does not cause harm. At the end of the day, people should be able (within reason) to use the models for what they want. We aren’t there yet but