Engineers and scientists who have made turbojets as safe and reliable as they are today haven't specifically worked on "turbojet safety," nor have they been required to "acknowledge there is a problem to be solved" by mobs of random people claiming they weren't doing their job
POLICY
-
GovFuture Podcast Interviews Public Sector Thought Leaders
By
–
GovFuture podcast continues to interview amazing guests and thought leaders in the public sector space! Rate and leave a written review of GovFuture podcast to help amplify this podcast: https://
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gov
future-podcast/id1690600225?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
… #GovFuture #podcast #reviews -
Safe Technology Deployment Path Will Prevail Over Unsafe Alternatives
By
–
No.
I'm claiming that if there is a way to build and deploy a technology in a safe way, that's the way it will happen.
The fact that there are zillions of ways to build unsafe versions of it is completely irrelevant.
Just like with turbojets. -
AI Safety Debate: Comparing Risks to Established Technologies
By
–
BS.
1. Turbojets actually enable the destruction of entire cities by bombing. Yet we still build turbojets.
2. There is exactly zero evidence that AI can ever cause the kind of destruction you allude to. -
Burden of Proof in AI Safety Claims and Technology Risk
By
–
You are claiming something exists. As with Bertrand Russell's teapot, the burden of proof is on you.
So far, it's just been sci-fi, scary sci-fi, but sci-fi nonetheless. A technology is not unsafe merely because of the possibility of doing it wrong.
A technology is safe because -
Phase Change Requires Human Innovation and Control
By
–
A phase change won't just "happen" as if it were a natural phenomenon.
A phase change won't happen unless it's enabled by the invention of a new method or technique.
*We* do this, and *we* are in control of it. -
US Propaganda Behind AI Deceleration Narrative Debate
By
–
Imho the whole decel talk is just US propaganda
-
Open Source AI and Preventing Regulatory Capture Risks
By
–
To prevent this:
– promote open source AI platforms
– fight attempts to gain regulatory capture
– prevent authoritarians and plutocrats from coming to power -
Open Source AI Democratizes Power Against Institutional Control
By
–
Technologies that empower humans by increasing communication, knowledge, and effective intelligence always cause opposition from people, governments, or institutions who want control and fear other humans.
The arguments against open source AI today mirror older arguments against