POLICY

→ View original post on X — @stanfordhai

Stanford Emerging Technology Review DC Launch Event

By

@stanfordhai

–

25 January 2024 20h29

Today at 1pm PT: @stanfordhai
's @drfeifei and @AmyZegart join other experts for the DC launch of the Stanford Emerging Technology Review. The discussion will highlight the findings of the SETR report on 10 key technologies and their policy implications: https://
setr.stanford.edu/events/stanfor
d-emerging-tech-review-dc-launch
…

Germany’s strict AI liability laws: attempting illegal acts punishable

By

–

25 January 2024 14h31

In Germany, even "the attempt is punishable" for many of the things covered in the news article.

Inference Services Legal Liability in AI Deployment Pipeline

By

–

25 January 2024 13h52

On the "user" side, almost everything is covered. On the dataset side as well IMHO. The parts in the middle of the pipeline such as inference services it's not clear yet — but if there are crimes either side inference services would be under pressure to do something.

→ View original post on X — @bernardmarr

Why Private AI Makes A Lot Of Sense Right Now

By

@bernardmarr

–

25 January 2024 13h00

Why Private AI Makes A Lot Of Sense Right Now https://
x.com/i/broadcasts/1
lPJqblzXNMxb
…

Child Abuse Material in AI Image Datasets: German Legal Framework

By

–

25 January 2024 11h56

These applications are powered by child abuse material that's been reported in popular image datasets. Thousands of illegal photos ensure generated nudes are realistic. In Germany, multiple (if not all) stages of this generative abuse pipeline fall under criminal law.

Musk’s PR Strategy for Invasive Brain Device Challenges Ethics

By

–

25 January 2024 9h27

Yes, Musk & co. are carefully planning and executing the PR for their invasive device to get around the reluctance you see. Since that started, I'm sure they'll find more volunteers among the techno-optimist crowd.

Manufacturing Consent for Technology: Beyond Bike Shedding Debates

By

–

25 January 2024 9h18

What makes it bike shedding rather than falling for an explicit and intentional agenda to manufacture consent for technology that people would otherwise reject?