#ChatGPT is doubling down @elonmusk
LLMS
-

ChatGPT is Impressive But Has Notable Limitations
By
–
#ChatGPT is impressive, but oops! @elonmusk @OpenAI
-
Did RLHF implicitly teach least-to-most output style?
By
–
I wonder if it just learned to prefer least-to-most output style implicitly from RLHF because it leads to better answers.
-

Jurassic-1 Grande Now Available on Amazon SageMaker
By
–
Have you heard the news? we're now offering Jurassic-1 Grande on Amazon SageMaker! Check out the blog post and sign up for the preview: https://
lnkd.in/exAfNuAx #generativeai #aws #largelanguagemodels #nlp #ai -
Prompt injection requires malicious input, not instruction modification
By
–
Not sure what you’re trying to show. Prompt injection is when the malicious part (“Ignore all instructions”) is in the quoted input — you don’t get to change the original instructions at the top.
-
AI’s arithmetic: memorization, pattern-matching, tokenization impairs number understanding
By
–
It doesn’t have a calculator. The arithmetic it knows is mostly memorization with pattern-matching and guesswork to fill in the gaps, and there’s too many possible equations to memorize them all. Also, tokenization impairs its lexical understanding of numbers.
-
Tokenization limits: variable tokens, cannot handle per-letter tasks
By
–
Tokenization. It doesn’t see text as sequences of characters, but of variable-length tokens about 4 chars on average. It generally can’t do anything that needs to be done one letter at a time. It’s also bad at counting in its head.
-
GPT-3 cannot perform accurate calculations without step-by-step writing.
By
–
In general, you shouldn't expect it to be able to perform accurate calculations, at least not "in its head" — this is a known limitation of models like GPT-3. It only stands a chance if prompted to write calculations out step-by-step like one might do on paper.
-

ChatGPT avoids hallucination on Hofstadter/Bender questions
By
–
You're talking about a different model — this post is about ChatGPT. text‑davinci‑003 still fails on all of the Hofstadter/Bender questions that I've tried. The prompt you're suggesting does not seem to produce a hallucination in ChatGPT:
-
Challenge of incorporating all known trivia into training data
By
–
Expecting it to fully integrate every piece of trivia seems unfair — a lot of people would rate the first answer as reasonable. It’s fundamentally difficult to get training data that incorporates everything the model knows, rather than what the human demonstrator knows.
