I wish there were an easier way. If you host the space you can record it, and you can have AI turn the recording into a transcript (a variety of ways to do that) then you can send the transcript to GPT, or other LLMs, and then you can do a ton of things. Like ask it "please
LLMS
-

Agent Toolkits Optimized for Newer Chat Models
By
–
A lot of agent toolkits were mostly designed to work with normal LLMs, not chat models But chat models are newer, faster, and generally better We're working on making all our agent toolkits usable with these chat models, s/o @fpingham for doing the first four!
-
QLoRA, Prefix Tuning, and LoRA: Fine-tuning Techniques Comparison
By
–
This was already a lot of coding. I am saving QLoRA for another day! @Yampeleg Regarding prefix tuning/LLaMA-Adapter vs LoRA. The performance is similar, but one advantage of the former is that it allows multimodal inputs (but that's also a post for another day :P)
-
Language Inclusion in Pretraining and Dataset Swapping
By
–
If the language has been included during pretraining, I that shouldn't be a problem (via swapping the dataset). Otherwise, I am not sure:
-
Proprietary Data and LLM Training Strategy for Enterprises
By
–
A few topics: * Why proprietary data enables enterprises to build higher quality large language models * Should your organization fine-tune pre-trained models or train from scratch * What are the steps that need to be considered before training your first model
-

Cerebras Tech Talk: Integrating Large Language Models in Enterprise
By
–
Join us for a Cerebras Tech Talk! On Thursday, June 22nd at 11:00 AM PT, we will discuss how enterprises can incorporate large language models into their organizations. Register: https://
hubs.li/Q01THKZD0 See below for topics that will be covered in this 30-minute session -
Fine-tuning Limitations and Cross-lingual Transfer in Language Models
By
–
Interesting point! Next to instruction-finetuning, finetuning is usually for a specific task (e.g., language translation). Not sure how well the model would do if you change source language. I.e., I haven't seen any studies investigating that, yet.
-

LoRA-trained models show competitive performance with less overfitting
By
–
The performance of LoRA-trained models is usually pretty competitive. Sometimes even better than fully finetuned (prob due to less overfitting).
(Table from https://
arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685) -
LLaMA-Adapter v2 Adds Trainable RMSNorm and Bias Parameters
By
–
Good question. Yes, because LLaMA-Adapter v2 is basically LLaMA-Adapter but it also has trainable RMSNorm parameters and trainable bias units (in FC layers)
-
LoRA vs Adapter: Performance and Memory Usage Comparison
By
–
Good question! On average: LoRA: 21.33 tokens/sec; Memory used: 14.59 GB
Adapter: 26.22 tokens/sec; Memory used: 14.59 GB