At face value, the claim sounds like a safety warning. It also seems to signal something unusually capable, consequential and maybe beyond what rivals have. It’s hard not to notice the names @AnthropicAI and @OpenAI are using:
— "Spud" (still just a codename) calls to mind
INNOVATION
-
Anthropic and OpenAI: Decoding Strategic AI Model Names
By
–
-
AI Company Gains Momentum with Anthropic-Aligned Strategy
By
–
Tienen mucho talento y creo que los movimientos de los últimos meses (acercándose mas al modelo de Anthropic) sumado con la ventaja en computación, les coloca ahora en una buena racha. Pero sí, llevaban una temporada difícil.
-
Advice to VCs: Avoid Technology Dependency in Robotics
By
–
Advice to VCs investing in robotics: when the underlying technology landscape is still changing SO incredibly quickly, avoid making bets that make you path dependent on a specific technology approach. (e.g. Vision Language Action Models vs. @GeneralistAI's System1/System 2 approach). We're still so early and have only seen ~0.1% of the ideas and innovation in this space. Invest in infrastructure & picks and shovels. [Translated from EN to English]
→ View original post on X — @ken_goldberg, 2026-04-13 18:39 UTC
-
Anthropic Mythos Sets New AI Competition Bar for OpenAI
By
–
Now that @AnthropicAI has introduced Mythos, the bar is set for @OpenAI and “Spud.” In today's @BigTechnology newsletter, @Kantrowitz look at what comes next. We also ask series of questions — like whether “too dangerous” is a new trend that's part warning & part marketing.
-
OpenAI’s Strategic Shift: From Google Model to Anthropic Alignment
By
–
If we analyze the last few months, the clear conclusion we can draw is that things started going badly for OpenAI when it tried to resemble Google, and they've started going well again when it returned to resembling Anthropic. In both cases, what they've lost is the aura of
-
AI Company Needs Chief Philosophical Officer Role
By
–
What’s an AI company without a CPO (Chief Philosophical Officer)?
-
AI Tooling Will Boost Software Reliability for Small Teams
By
–
Me: I actually expect that software reliablity goes up rather than down over the next 2-3 years as the tooling for this gets just radically better and weirder than anything we've had before. Small teams are going to get BigCo levels of reliability. Not perfect but Really Good.
-
Operational Excellence as Moat in AI-Written Code Era
By
–
Anthony: "Operational excellence" is a defensible moat. As more code is AI written, quality inevitably goes down. Most people using one-off apps are going to get burned, repeatedly, and they will try to offload that to someone whose only job is This Can't Blow Up.
-
AI Transforming Software Teams: Economics and Org Design
By
–
with @staysaasy
, our second anonymous pod ever: https://
youtube.com/watch?v=5KnCKa
dxSPY
… A conversation with the Stay Sassy duo on how AI is changing software teams, management, internal tooling, and the economics of building. Includes sharp takes on token budgets, org design, and review -
AI Will Crater the Cost of SaaS Feature Development
By
–
Anthony: We once considered feature development to be a core part of running a SaaS business. Required both some amount of taste and relatively large time/money due to engineers. Cost of features will *crater.*