You can avoid running out of patience by ensuring the work stays fun, working with people who are nice to work with, ensuring that you stay on-mission forever so you care about what you do, and exercising and sleeping well. Or some combination of those things.
ETHICS
-
Consciousness requirement for AI moral agency
By
–
It you want it to care one way or the other, it has to be conscious.
-
Managing AI Risk Perception: Distinguishing Real from Existential Threats
By
–
X was attempting to gently suggest to the client that they were catastrophizing and that the tech risk was in fact not existential.
-
Cautious AI Communication: Legal Language vs Bold Influencer Claims
By
–
Of the options you suggest, I seriously doubt it's an "oversight" — but I guess you're writing threads more like a lawyer would than an influencer making bold statements.
-
Tech Risk Management Paradox: Burning Down Buildings
By
–
There’s a classic piece of lore of this: X: *describes mitigating tech risk*
Client: Can’t be done! If that happens we’re finished.
X: Wait what if the building burns down.
Client: Oh that’s recoverable. Insurance, etc.
X: Great new plan if tech risk happens we burn bldg down. -
Government Interactions: Legal Representation and Security Protocols
By
–
This is also standard advice from security professionals. If the government needs information from you or your firm, you want that interaction to happen in an office room with a lawyer present rather than in public with someone who possesses a firearm.
-
Claude Opus Published as Lead Author on arXiv Response Paper
By
–
Claude is now being listed as an author on arXiv papers A response paper to Apple's "Illusion of Thinking" work just dropped with Claude Opus as first author, critiquing their experimental design and arguing the reasoning collapse was actually just token limit constraints.
-
Authentic automation: beyond mere efficiency and self-replacement
By
–
i don’t want to just automate myself, i want to authentically automate myself, whatever that means
-
Questioning causal claims in AI feature interpretation
By
–
neat why do you claim features are *causal*?