You speak in the future as if it didn't happen; deluding yourself? It did happen multiple times already and each time analysis was conducted under Copyright law. The uses before training were found to be expressive because all the work was used.
ETHICS
-
Copyright Fair Use Analysis in AI Model Training
By
–
You're confusing everything again, the reproductions before training and possible downstream uses. The downstream uses can potentially be non-expressive. If it was entirely non-expressive, it wouldn't fall under Copyright and there wouldn't have been Fair Use analysis needed.
-
Judge Alsup’s Copyright Analysis Better Than Judge Chhabria’s Approach
By
–
From that perspective, Judge Alsup did a much better job. He identified and pointed out the overwhelming number of reproductions (under Copyright law) and conducted his a Fair Use analysis trying to break them down separately. Judge Chhabria was much worse technically.
-
Microsoft’s MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator Outperforms Doctors in Medical Cases
By
–
Microsoft just dropped MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator — a medical AI that outperforms doctors.
— Rowan Cheung (@rowancheung) 1 juillet 2025
It solved 85.5% of 304 cases vs. just 20% by experienced physicians (5–20 yrs)
Also delivered greater cost savings than human doctorspic.twitter.com/wCB3bpbsuiMicrosoft just dropped MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator — a medical AI that outperforms doctors. It solved 85.5% of 304 cases vs. just 20% by experienced physicians (5–20 yrs) Also delivered greater cost savings than human doctors
-
AI Training Now Legally Classified Under Copyright Law
By
–
Well, the overwhelming consensus is now that the activities around AI training fall under Copyright law. The "non-expressive use" folks always had a fringe opinion, but have lost. Not just caselaw but regulations codify it. There may be exceptions to the rule, but not important.
-
Civil Liberties Groups Oppose AI Ban Proposals
By
–
Civil liberties organizations, the National Conference of State Legislatures and a bipartisan group of state attorneys general, and other have opposed both the 10-year AI ban and the 5-year version.
-
Audiobook Production: A Deliberate Act of Resistance Against AI Imperialism
By
–
This was something I discussed a lot with my audiobook producer. It only felt right in the context of a book critiquing the imperial nature of AI development. A small act of resistance. Thank you so much for noticing! You can find the audiobook here: https://
penguinrandomhouse.com/books/743569/e
mpire-of-ai-by-karen-hao/
… -
Agent Smith: Never Send Human to Machine Job
By
–
Agent Smith : "Never send a human to do a machine's job." #AGIALPHA #AGIFirst
-
Stanford Expert on AI Use in Academic Settings
By
–
How are Stanford experts using AI? In this new @Stanford series, @StanfordHAI Senior Fellow @Rbaltman explains why he permits AI in classes, rejects it for recommendation letters, and feels both cautious and optimistic about its future:
-
AI Creates a New Technological and Economic Aristocracy
By
–
AI creates a new aristocracy.
Meta pays its engineers 100 million annual salary like football stars. The battle is no longer played on a field, but on code. Those who don't understand AI will remain on minimum wage before being replaced.