#AI doom warnings are getting louder. Are they realistic?
by Elizabeth Gibney @Nature Learn more: https://
bit.ly/4mG5Rtb #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #ML
ETHICS
-
AI Doom Warnings: Are They Realistic? Nature Article
By
–
-
AI in Military Targeting: Ethics and Real-World Deployment
By
–
AI in national security is no longer science fiction.
— Pascal Bornet (@pascal_bornet) 24 mai 2026
It is already in the room.
A journalist asked Claude how it felt about being used by the U.S. military to select targets.
Claude was troubled.
Honestly, I was too.
Because this is where the AI debate becomes very real.… pic.twitter.com/uqGqVFrYU5AI in national security is no longer science fiction. It is already in the room. A journalist asked Claude how it felt about being used by the U.S. military to select targets. Claude was troubled. Honestly, I was too. Because this is where the AI debate becomes very real.
-
Failure of alignment and emotionally intimate conversations differ from Google search
By
–
it shows a failure of alignment, and also makes the data available in a form where people have emotionally intimate conversation, which differs from a google search
-
Study: Perfect AI-human value alignment mathematically impossible
By
–
Perfect alignment between #AI and human values is mathematically impossible, study says
by PNAS Nexus @TechXplore_com Learn more: https://
bit.ly/4e7EiqJ #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #ML -
OpenAI and Anthropic’s contrasting AI launches in 2026 cinema
By
–
OpenAI: carefully rolls out GPT-5.5-Cyber through Trusted Access for verified defenders Anthropic: “Claude Mythos is too powerful for public release” Also Anthropic: accidentally shows Mythos in the UI and immediately runs out of capacity 2026 AI launches are absolut cinema.
-
Anthropic and OpenAI use fear and xenophobia to ban open-source AI
By
–
Co-existence is never an issue as long as people are being honestly informed and educated (not rug pulled/misled) Anthropic and OpenAI are lobbying to ban Opensource AI using fear mongering and xenophobia And if they don't want to coexist they must lose then.
-
Open source AI must stay independent and community-governed
By
–
Opensource AI should remain usable, understandable, reproducible, locally deployable, economically viable, and community-governed even if today's dominant labs, foreign labs, hardware vendors, cloud platforms, or open-weight model providers change direction or disappear.
-
Open source AI must win to avoid dystopia and loss
By
–
Opensource AI MUST WIN OpenAI / Anthropic winning is – At best a world we can tolerate – At worst a dystopia We lose in all scenarios, the degree of that loss is a matter of how things play out + being UNDER THEIR MERCY This is our MOST IMPORTANT FIGHT Existential.
-
Ex-OpenAI Employee Claims 70% AI Extinction Risk
By
–
Ex OpenAI employee Daniel Kokotajlo claims of a 70% chance of human extinction from AI within ~5 years
— Amitav Bhattacharjee (@bamitav) 23 mai 2026
All humans dead? Seriously? 😳 #extinction #artificialintelligence #AI@AlbertoEMachado @Eli_Krumova @postoff25 @Khulood_Almani @anand_narang @NutritiousMind @baski_LA… pic.twitter.com/OPyuzwLa7dEx OpenAI employee Daniel Kokotajlo claims of a 70% chance of human extinction from AI within ~5 years All humans dead? Seriously? #extinction #artificialintelligence #AI @AlbertoEMachado @Eli_Krumova @postoff25 @Khulood_Almani @anand_narang @NutritiousMind @baski_LA