That's when soul, emotion, and depth come into the conversation.
ETHICS
-
Can AI Tools Help Artists Preserve Emotional Depth?
By
–
I hear you. Then can an artist using AI as a tool still infuse their work with emotional depth and soul?
-
When Does Artistic Inspiration Become Unethical Copying?
By
–
All artists are inspired by other works and artists. At what point does it not become ok?
-
Does AI-Generated Content Qualify as Art?
By
–
This is exactly what I'm asking in the poll. Do you categorize AI art under your definition of art?
-
Text Mining Exceptions vs AI Model Training Legal Boundaries
By
–
Or processing books to count word frequency statistics, that's a valid Text & Data-Mining exception. It's very different than learning to regenerate the same book word-by-word!
-
AI Community Deserves Options: Pause or Continue Debate
By
–
It needs to be answered with the same amount of publicity. PAUSE or CONTINUE? THE AI COMMUNITY DESERVES OPTIONS. The Future of Life Institute Open Letter only offers 1 option (Pause). The new @Montreal_AI
Open Letter presents the missing choice (Continue) to humanity. Pause -
Japan AI Data Mining Copyright Compliance Berne Convention
By
–
This is limited to non-expressive data-mining, or "information analysis" as they call it. If they approximate the image or reproduce Copyrighted expressions, then Japan is bound to the Berne Convention like any other country.
-
Fair Use Training Contaminates Entire AI Applications with Legal Risk
By
–
TL:DR; You can't go from RED to ORANGE. Any component trained under Fair Use remains RED until you retrain. It will contaminate all the other parts of your application too, so even if the rest is GREEN you're still liable for the worst case RED bit!
-
Fair Use as Lifecycle Assumption in AI Applications
By
–
If you disagree, don't look at me. I don't decide and I don't care if you get sued 😉 Just trying to explain that Fair Use is not a single moment in time it's a set of assumptions you take on during the whole application's lifecycle.