ETHICS

→ View original post on X — @alexjc

CEO’s No-Copyright Content Feature Raises Ethical Concerns

By

@alexjc

–

03 November 2023 11h47

Your CEO advertised no-Copyrighted content as a feature… (IMHO that's incorrect.) The logical implication is that both of you think it's OK, otherwise your company wouldn't commercialize it! Understood about no debates, here's my final statement:

→ View original post on X — @alexjc

Fine-tuning Models Cannot Bypass Copyright Infringement Claims

By

@alexjc

–

03 November 2023 11h47

If your startup reproduces a "Belgian School Comics" fine-tune hoping get around a lawsuit for #Samivel's Copyrighted content, it's not going to work. That content is in the original base model and you're *intentionally* trying to replicate it (+PR) so it's still infringement…

→ View original post on X — @bernardmarr

UK’s First-Ever Artificial Intelligence Safety Summit Overview

By

@bernardmarr

–

03 November 2023 11h21

What Happened At The UK's First-Ever #ArtificialIntelligence #Safety #Summit? The event, which was attended by delegations from over 30 countries and leaders from tech giants including #Alphabet, #Meta and #OpenAI, was on safety concerns around #AI. https://
forbes.com/sites/bernardm
arr/2023/11/03/what-happened-at-the-uks-first-ever-artificial-intelligence-safety-summit/
…

→ View original post on X — @alexjc

Stable Diffusion Fine-tuning Copyright Dataset Concerns

By

@alexjc

–

03 November 2023 8h31

You're fine-tuning SD, right? You're aware that Samivel is in the original datasets too, yes? Why are you trying to avoid Copyrighted images on the fine-tune only? Might as well own it…

→ Voir le post original sur X — @flashtweet

Big Tech agrees independent audits needed for AI model oversight

By

@flashtweet

–

03 November 2023 8h09

Je suis d’accord : c’est juridiquement non contraignant et la Chine n’a pas signé. Mais on avance et je trouve la réponse des Big Tech intéressante. Beaucoup conviennent qu’il ne peuvent pas auditer seul leurs modèles et qu’ils ont besoin d’une 3e partie indépendante pour le

Unpaid AI Work: Volunteers vs. Financial Incentives

By

–

03 November 2023 4h35

I very much doubt anyone is paying them for this. Certainly all my work in the field is as an unpaid volunteer. There's piles of money available on the other side, so anyone in this for $$$ should focus there.

Openness and Transparency as AI Risk Mitigation Strategies

By

–

03 November 2023 3h30

Other things could *also* mitigate those harms. But openness, transparency, and broad access do seem likely to be helpful towards mitigation. You could quite reasonably argue that some firms today are "openness-washing" – but that doesn't make the statement wrong either AFAICT.

Openness and Transparency as Harm Mitigation Strategy

By

–

03 November 2023 3h28

I don't think the statement has that premise – the "alone" you added doesn't appear there, and totally changes the meaning. The statement merely says that a reason to "to embrace openness, transparency, and broad access" is to "mitigate current and future harms".

Evaluating Quality Analysis Beyond Credentials and Authority

By

–

03 November 2023 2h35

Not knowing forces you to consider the argument and data directly, rather than using credentials as a proxy. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. I don't know who @1a3orn is, but I have noticed previously that their writing, analysis, and research is v high quality.