OpenAI’s blog post doesn’t given much detail, but says his “departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board.” https://
openai.com/blog/openai-an
nounces-leadership-transition
…
ETHICS
-
OpenAI Leadership Transition Following Board Candor Review
By
–
-
OpenAI interim CEO Mira Murati replaces departing Sam Altman
By
–
"Chief technology officer Mira Murati appointed interim CEO to lead OpenAI; Sam Altman departs the company. "Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board,
-
OpenAI removes CEO Altman over lack candid communication
By
–
“Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board. …The board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI.” https://
openai.com/blog/openai-an
nounces-leadership-transition
… -
Against meritocracy: bold challenge to AI systems
By
–
Tout le contraire de la méritocratie. Fallait oser.
-
AI Adoption Challenges: Local Communities Navigate Poorly Calibrated Solutions
By
–
It’s great as a customer, some stores do make it through the Tokyo meet grinder, and there’s some social value in letting people swing even if they’re swinging in a poorly calibrated manner… … and yet, you meet them because they’re your neighbors, and it’s rough, right?
-
The Limitations of AI: What Machines Cannot Do
By
–
The Limitations of AI: What Machines Can't Do https://
linkedin.com/pulse/limitati
ons-ai-what-machines-cant-do-nicolas-babin-0kide
…
#ArtificialIntelligence #machinelearning #innovation #technology #data @CurieuxExplorer @Shi4Tech @jblefevre60 @kalydeoo @Ym78200 @pierrepinna @AkwyZ @BetaMoroney @Khulood_Almani @IsabellePiel29 @enilev @3itcom -
UnRLHF Project Reveals LLM Safeguard Vulnerability Risks
By
–
There is this project called unRLHF, where they undo LLM safeguards. According to the examples, the LLM becomes quite evil, giving advice on "how to microwave a child" https://
lesswrong.com/posts/3eqHYxfW
b5x4Qfz8C/unrlhf-efficiently-undoing-llm-safeguards
… -
Understanding vs. Deployment: The Knowledge Requirement Debate
By
–
Weird doomer argument: "society should not deploy because *I* don't fully understand it, and I believe no one else does, either."
-
Higher hallucination standard needed for ordinary chatbot users
By
–
Researchers can plausibly deal with hallucinations — experiment with prompt variations, responsibly verify the output, etc. It’s chatbots used by ordinary people that deserve a higher standard because those users’ priors for its correctness are highest.
-
Being hilariously bad is safe, Galactica fears overblown
By
–
Being hilariously bad isn’t dangerous. That’s one of the safest ways to be bad. I barely tried Galactica so I don’t have a strong take on how bad it was, but the danger of its out-of-thin-air citations was overblown. Llama2 base is no less hallucinatory and we survived.