BS.
1. Turbojets actually enable the destruction of entire cities by bombing. Yet we still build turbojets.
2. There is exactly zero evidence that AI can ever cause the kind of destruction you allude to.
ETHICS
-
AI Safety Debate: Comparing Risks to Established Technologies
By
–
-
Burden of Proof in AI Safety Claims and Technology Risk
By
–
You are claiming something exists. As with Bertrand Russell's teapot, the burden of proof is on you.
So far, it's just been sci-fi, scary sci-fi, but sci-fi nonetheless. A technology is not unsafe merely because of the possibility of doing it wrong.
A technology is safe because -
GPT’s Apparent Intelligence Improvement Questioned as Marketing
By
–
Don’t know man… GPT seems really much smarter than before. I guess it’s all a PR stunt.
-
Phase Change Requires Human Innovation and Control
By
–
A phase change won't just "happen" as if it were a natural phenomenon.
A phase change won't happen unless it's enabled by the invention of a new method or technique.
*We* do this, and *we* are in control of it. -
AI Technology Risk: Isolation vs Human Connection
By
–
I’ll be deeply sad if this technology is used to isolate us and make people more alone. The world needs more human connection, not less.
-
AI Cannot Replace Human Love and Connection
By
–
AI is not a substitute for finding another human you love.
-
AI indistinguishable from humans: the end of differentiation
By
–
Yeah, so.. it’s over? One cannot differentiate between human and ai, can he?
-
The Devil Makes You Busy: Distraction in AI Era
By
–
“If the Devil can’t make you sin, he’ll make you busy.”
-
Open Source AI and Preventing Regulatory Capture Risks
By
–
To prevent this:
– promote open source AI platforms
– fight attempts to gain regulatory capture
– prevent authoritarians and plutocrats from coming to power -
GPT-4 Secretly Updated to Spread Rumors and Hype
By
–
Same happened with gpt4. They sneakily updated GPT to increase rumors and hype