So much of the #AIhype I'm seeing these days is 2nd-hand hype, where someone has identified a legitimate need and then fallen for the technochauvanist line that "genAI" (synthetic media extruding machines) will meet that need. >>
CULTURE
-
How AI Transforms Our Relationship With Time
By
–
Lecture des dernières épreuves de mon livre "Le Nouveau Temps", à paraître en novembre. Dans un monde d'accélération et de vitesse, marqué par l'avènement de l'IA, notre rapport au temps se métamorphose. Hate de partager ces reflexions avec vous !
-
Copyright Debate: Capitalism vs Communist Ideology in AI
By
–
Yes, I agree completely! You phrased it very well too. Surprised so many people are arguing against Copyright on the basis of capitalism, but it seems more like a communist mindset.
-
AI Copyright Debate: Finding Balance or Sliding Toward Free-for-All
By
–
Is there a middle ground in Copyright debate? If loopholes are made wider for AI, I don't see how © holds. Some want to abolish it; many claim it's about "balancing of interest" — but I don't see how that could ever work. Seems like a slippery slope into free-for-all. Thoughts?
-
Legal boundaries between random creation inspiration derivative forgery
By
–
There's a continuous scale between "random creation" "inspiration" "derivative" "forgery". The burden is on the author to navigate that legally. Some of those are fine but it always depends on the use.
-
TRIPS and Berne: Author Rights Protection Framework
By
–
To clarify the relationship between TRIPS and Berne: TRIPS mandates all of Berne (except 6bis) thus all the fundamental rights granted to authors are still valid and your secondary objectives can be achieved only in ways that do not prejudice the legitimate interest of authors.
-
Copyright removal and TRIPS compliance in AI context
By
–
OK, let's dig in there then. How is removing copyright balancing interests in a way that complies with TRIPS 7 & 8?
-
Berne Convention Protects Creator Rights Over Balance
By
–
The Berne Convention, which 181 countries signed including India, explicitly states it's about protecting the rights of authors. The "balance" is not the goal, it emerges out of protecting economic and moral rights of creators.
-
Getty’s Copyright Licensing Strategy for AI-Generated Content
By
–
Getty needs to license content knowing there are no liabilities open, and the chain of title for Copyrights is clean. Getty knows the business of licensing better than anyone. It helps understand the Big Picture to look at what companies with skin in the game are doing!
-
AI Copyright Ethics: Balancing Rights and Creative Consent
By
–
1. If you allow AI companies to take anything they want, there is no balance only the end of Copyright. 2. Creative culture is heavily based on credits, collaborations, compensation. Also works. Why do you like the option that violates consent?