ChatGPT-5: The Next Leap in Generative AI OpenAI has officially launched ChatGPT-5 — described by Sam Altman as “a significant step along our path to AGI.”
In his talk, Altman emphasized GPT-5’s:
• PhD-level expertise for complex problem-solving
• Speed & intelligence
BIG TECH
-
ChatGPT-5 Launch: OpenAI’s Major Step Toward AGI
By
–
-
GPT-5 Mini Output Issues Raise OpenAI Communication Concerns
By
–
As predicted, examples of GPT-5 nano or mini producing bad outputs abound online. Not making it clear how GPT-5 works will likely cause issues for OpenAI. I wonder if they will need to take a different approach to switching or at least educating users about what GPT-5 does.
-
GPT-5 Pricing Updates and First GPT-6 Comments
By
–
some big gpt5 pricing and the first gpt6 comment
-
OpenAI GPT-5 Documentation Bug: Missing Integration Testing
By
–
Does OpenAI not do basic integration testing? At the time of release, the first code sample provided in the GPT-5 docs could not be run, because someone accidentally deleted the `output_text` property. My CI notified me. Why didn't theirs? https://
github.com/openai/openai-
python/commit/e574c12f9e2e738451ac010bdc52f4ee59813cfb
… -
GPT-5 Pro Delivers Strong Performance After Public Release
By
–
GPT-5 Pro is really good, though. I didn’t gat to use it before public release.
-
GPT-5 Fragmentation: Multiple Versions Create User Confusion
By
–
So we have something like five versions of GPT-5 and now people have to know that GPT-5 Pro is better than GPT-5 Thinking which is better than GPT-5 unless GPT-5 decides to hand off your question to GPT-5 Thinking or GPT-5 Pro which you cannot control or know if it is happening.
-
GPT-5 Progress Falls Short of Expectations
By
–
The lack of progress in GPT-5 was worse than I expected.
-
GPT-5 Release: Solid Update or Overhyped Launch?
By
–
Just waking up in Japan. What’s the consensus on GPT-5? It seems like a solid release that got overhyped.
-
OpenAI’s Failed Presentation: Poor Charts and Quality Control Questions
By
–
With all due respect: But that really was the epitome of a fail. With the poorly made charts, OpenAI attracts ridicule. And I would love to know how that happened. I imagine that the presentation of the most important model was checked by someone, isn't it?