Open research and open source code for AI has been a trademark of Meta – FAIR from its beginnings 10 years ago. In fact, without Meta's PyTorch, there would be no OpenAI products today.
They're all built on PyTorch.
@ylecun
-
Meta’s PyTorch: Foundation of OpenAI’s AI Products
By
–
-
Meta’s Open Source Strategy: Llama-2 Release Benefits Outweigh Risks
By
–
The groundswell of interest for Llama-1 (and for all our previous open source AI packages, Like PyTorch, DINO, SAM, NLLB, wav2vec…) is what convinced the Meta leadership that the benefits of an open release of Llama-2 would overwhelmingly outweigh the risks and transform the https://
x.com/sriramk/status
/sriramk/status/1719345371560677603
… -
AI Regulation Debate: Driving Assistance Systems and Executive Order
By
–
No.
The deployment of driving assistance systems is already regulated, whether they use modern machine learning-based AI or not.
Regulating product deployment makes complete sense, particularly for life-critical applications like driving.
But this EO regulates AI research and -
IBM supports open source AI research and development
By
–
Yes, IBM is very much on the side of open source AI R&D.
-
Tech Leaders Exaggerate AI Existential Risk Concerns
By
–
You'd have to ask Andrew.
Lying is a big word that I haven't used.
I think some of these tech leaders are genuinely worried about existential risk.
I think they are wrong.
I think they exaggerate it.
I think they have an unwarranted superiority complex that leads them to believe -
Big Tech Open Sources AI Models While Debating Existential Risk
By
–
Well, at least *one* Big Tech company is open sourcing AI models and not lying about AI existential risk
-
Meta on Content Moderation and Government Regulation Responsibility
By
–
My name is not Mark Zuckerberg.
This was about asking governments for definitions of what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable content online.
Meta doesn't see itself as having the legitimacy to do so.
But in the absence of regulation, it has to do so.
It's actually the exact -
AI Progress Is Human-Driven Not Inevitable
By
–
It's a false analogy.
Progress in AI is done by people we know.
It's not some sort of unstoppable natural phenomenon. -
Current AI limitations require fundamental innovations for AGI
By
–
Perhaps there is a watefall, but we are not on that river right now.
The river we are on leads to a pond with no naviguable exit.
A dead end.
To get to animal-level AI, we need to invent the helicopter.
We can't describe a safe helicopter because we can't describe a helicopter. -
Open Source AI Ban Won’t Stop Rogue Nation Threats
By
–
If you are asking:
"Should democracies protect themselves against threats by bad actors and rogue nations?"
The answer is obviously yes.
But the real question is:
"Will a ban on open source AI reduce the threat from rogue nations and bad actors?"
The answer is a resounding no. In