Well, that was kind of the idea behind the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine, but nevermind. AI is designed to make humanity smarter, not wipe out entire cities.
I fail to see how this analogy has any relevance.
@ylecun
-
AI Design Philosophy: Enhancement Not Destruction
By
–
-
PlayStation 2 export controls: computing power restrictions precedent
By
–
Like when there was an export control on computers above 1 GFLOPS and when the Sony PlayStation-2 came out in 2000, it was above the limit https://
theregister.com/2000/04/17/pla
ystation_2_exports/
… -
AI Extinction Risk: Human Agency and Potential Salvation
By
–
My estimate is:
"considerably less than most other potential causes of human extinction"
Because we have agency in this. It's not like some sort of natural phenomenon that we can't stop. Conversely, AI could actually save humanity from extinction.
What is your estimate for that -
Andrew Ng argues against excessive open source AI regulation
By
–
A nice piece by @AndrewYNg arguing that irrational fears about AI should not cause governments to regulate open source AI models out of existence.
-
Open AI Research Under Threat From Restrictive Policies
By
–
You and Yoshua are inadvertently helping those who want to put AI research and development under lock and key and protect their business by banning open research, open-source code, and open-access models. This will inevitably lead to bad outcomes in the medium term.
-
President’s Executive Order on AI Key Highlights
By
–
A few interesting points highlighted by @kchonyc in the President's Executive Order on AI.
-
Former ESMFold Team Startup Eyes Paris Relocation Move
By
–
The former ESMFold team (now a startup) should move to Paris then? @ebetica
, @alexrives
, @TomSercu ? -
Tesla’s Lack of AI Research Contributions Criticized
By
–
Tesla doesn't even publish technical papers.
Never mind open source code.
Their contribution to AI knowledge has been precisely zilch. -
Quantifying actual harms versus AI benefits tradeoffs
By
–
Do you have examples of *actual* harm that would justify giving up on the benefits?