Curious to hear your rationale. Sounds a bit like ACL Rolling Review (
@ReviewAcl
) that the NLP community has adopted.
@thegautamkamath
-
ACL Rolling Review adoption in NLP research community
By
–
-
Grad Student Timeline Incentives Impact Career Readiness
By
–
I can see this perspective, but ironically it seems like a negative to me. Incentivizes pushing grad students out the door, whether they feel they're ready to go or not. I'm really thankful my advisor let me stay for 6 years. What side do other folks here fall on?
-
arXiv as Definitive Version for Research Publication
By
–
For my own work, I view the arXiv version as the definitive version, no matter what conference or journal it's in. No weird page limits, templates, etc., everything is just the way I intend it. It may also be a carry-over from other fields, where proceedings are often closed.
-
Student Admission Process: Conversations Before Acceptance Decisions
By
–
I of course talk to students after they apply, but before I accept them, and even more before they decide.
-
Australia’s PhD Visa Backlog Crisis Impacts Graduate Students
By
–
Australia is currently having *serious* issues with visas for grad students. Backlogs of *years* to get a visa to start your PhD. Thanks to @ccanonne_ (featured in this article) for shining a spotlight on this problem.
-
Faculty Outreach Strategy for University Application Success
By
–
You don't have to reach out to any professors. Just apply and mention their name in your application. In most cases, reaching out to faculty will not help your chances.
-
Personalized emails outperform generic outreach in top 1%
By
–
A well targeted non-form email, that shows you read their papers and can engage with it well, probably places you in the top 1% of emails that person receives. 4.5/n
-
Demonstrate genuine engagement in academic research outreach
By
–
3. Show that you're genuinely interested. Emails I get often name-drop a paper of mine and say one sentence about it. This is a transparent form email. If you can instead demonstrate you've engaged with the area and their work, that'll get attention 4/n
-
Professional Email Etiquette for Researchers and Tech Community
By
–
a) Don't email people who ask not to be
b) Use common sense (e.g., send 1 email not 18, don't follow up a million times, don't try to track them)
c) Try to *genuinely* engage with their work (don't just namedrop a paper)
d) Prepare yourself to be totally ignored. Its not personal -
Automating supervisor outreach raises ethical concerns
By
–
If someone's using a shell script to contact potential supervisors, I think they're doing something wrong…