agreed. RL is not (at least by itself) the way to alignment https://t.co/CIH9mXaC0H
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 13 mai 2026
agreed. RL is not (at least by itself) the way to alignment
By
–
agreed. RL is not (at least by itself) the way to alignment https://t.co/CIH9mXaC0H
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) 13 mai 2026
agreed. RL is not (at least by itself) the way to alignment
By
–
sure there have been some positive uses cases. but that what is marred by how many artists would screwed in the process. and this is just one of many negative consequences. in my overall judgement, genai has on net has been a negative for society.
By
–
that’s not the logic per se there is no deep comprehension because there are no world models recombination of partial regurgitation is what they do instead
By
–
this quote does not mean the same thing. Hinton is trying to saddle me with saying the memorization is the only operative process and I never said that and don’t say it in this quote. there is not “that is all” here putting together bits of text is not the same pure
By
–
that’s actual speculative; so far OpenAI and Anthropic have lost money and most businesses have not gotten significant RoI
By
–
“Marcus's repeated warnings about the "wall of generalization" since 1998 have once again been proven true.”
By
–
excel didn’t have LLMs in the 90s (it did have some ML, which I have praised, but not that far back).
By
–
start with https://
open.substack.com/pub/garymarcus
/p/how-o3-and-grok-4-accidentally-vindicated?r=8tdk6&utm_medium=ios
… and my substack piece on Claude Code and then read my 2001 book The Algebraic Mind
By
–
claude code is an immense neurosymbolic effort to ward off the failure of pure LLMs. you sir are lost.
By
–
it’s a klugey neurosymbolic system but its certainly neurosymbolic. it’s certainly NOT a pure neural networks, and certainly not a pure symbolic system. it is a blend. (and of course lots of symbolic systems are kluges)