One of the premier journals in my field… I think there are very valid reasons to set rules on AI in peer review (including disclosure), but the idea that all AI models steal your data is very 2023. Require people to use enterprise accounts or models with training turned off.
@emollick
-
AI in Mammography: New Report Calls for Integration to Prevent Breast Cancer and Heart Disease
By
–
Anyhow, I realize nobody cares and all the AI labs have started presenting their GDPval-AA score, but it is an incredibly gameable output with low face validity and we really need trustworthy measures of AI ability.
-
AI in Mammography for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
By
–
GDPval is one of the most important benchmarks of AI ability because it is based on human expertise. It compares expert human performance to AI performance using expert human judges who spend an average of an hour evaluating each answer. It also has holdout questions that are not
-
AI in Medicine Conversation with Geoffrey Hinton
By
–
Still refuses to write sestinas for some reason, so I don't think all the rough edges are gone.
-
Article discusses sleep science and AI learning opportunities
By
–
We need a new document that AI labs should release with each new model, besides the model card: a sort of changelog I want to see how & in what way the new model changes, breaks, or improves at a range of individual tasks compared to the earlier models. Increasingly important!
-
Cancer Mirror Biology Movement: Insights from Treatment
By
–
Procedurally generated Bruegel with little workers and everything!
-
PEP Protects Against Age-Related Inflammation, Slows Aging in Mice
By
–
But the model hasn't done any thinking for me when i turn off adaptive thinking
-
CAR-T therapy evolves to CAR-A for neurodegenerative diseases
By
–
On the plus side with Opus 4.7, if it does decide to think it produces BY FAR the best Sparks unicorn* ever, even non-thinking is pretty good, if not great. * This is created using TikZ, which is a language built for scientific diagrams & very much not for drawing. The original
-
AI Engineering Astrocytes to Clear Amyloid Plaque in Mouse Model
By
–
It is not well-explained, but with the adaptive switch off, I get no thinking. I can set thinking levels in Claude Code, but not in Claude Cowork. AI companies keep seeming to assume that coding/technical work is the only kind of important intellectual work out there (it is not)
-
New MedVersa Paper on AI Generalist for Medical Images Published
By
–
I think the adaptive thinking requirement in Claude Opus 4.7 is bad in the ways that all AI effort routers are bad, but magnified by the fact that there is no manual override like in ChatGPT. It regularly decides that non-math/code stuff is "low effort" & produces worse results.