At an even lower level, you can create your own custom tokenizer on a new vocabulary, or pretrain your own backbone. The KerasNLP APIs will be useful to you no matter how advanced you use case becomes. Be sure to check out the starter guide: https://
keras.io/guides/keras_n
lp/getting_started/
…
RESEARCH
-
KerasNLP APIs for Custom Tokenizers and Advanced NLP Use Cases
By
–
-

Training Costs for Large Deep Learning Models Rising Significantly
By
–
I also made this prediction, which I still think will soon kick in, as the cost of training modern very large deep models is getting pretty high…
-

AI Models Approaching 100 Trillion Parameters Ahead of Schedule
By
–
In my 2018 keynote at ICML I showed this curve and predicted that in 2025 we would have models with 100 trillion parameters. We might get there sooner…
-
GPT-2 Development Finally Showing Results and Success
By
–
Finally all that tinkering since GPT-2 is paying off
-

TMLR Launches Expert Certification and Conference Partnerships for 2023
By
–
For 2023:
– TMLR's Expert Certification reviewers will be selected
– An Outstanding Certification will be made
– Partnerships to present TMLR papers at specific conferences (AutoML, CoLLAs, and maybe even ICLR)
– Going beyond PDFs for papers! 7/7 -

OpenReview engineers advance community research infrastructure platform
By
–
There's been some awesome work by @openreviewnet engineers, particularly @melisabok and Celeste Martinez Gomez, for adding some crucial functionality to OpenReview. So glad we have them and this awesome resource for the community! 6/n
-

Fast Conference Review Turnaround Accelerates AI Research Publication
By
–
But I think the biggest news is just how *fast* the turnaround is. At ~75 days median, that's 2.5 months from submission to notification. The big conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR) are closer to 4 months. And much faster than JMLR, which takes > 200 days to first reviews. 5/n
-
TMLR releases first year operations report highlights
By
–
TMLR (
@TmlrOrg
) just put out a report on their first (almost) year of operations. Here's a with some of the highlights. https://
docs.google.com/document/d/1tJ
Tw-LUJqENC5yxwmcTqlj4_Va1fWFqv7Lxt3eKMcqE/
… 1/n -
TMLR publishes 188 papers with 62% acceptance rate
By
–
TMLR numbers:
– 651 submissions
– 188 accepted papers
– currently ~100 submissions/month
– 189 action editors
– 1846 reviewers
– acceptance rate: 62% (46% if you count desk rejections and withdrawls)
– median time to decision: 76 days (#NeurIPS2022: 118 days, JMLR: >200 days) 2/n -
Choosing the Best Title for Google vs OpenAI Analysis
By
–
Need help deciding titles for my next piece on Google vs OpenAI! Ideas A: The Ultimate Guide to the Google vs OpenAI Debate
B: Every Google vs OpenAI Argument, Dissected
C: Should Sundar have ordered the Code Red?
D: Write in