Few of those cases are on the Copyright level — many are about Rights Management, privacy, etc.
REGULATION
-
AI Developers Ignore Non-Expressive Use Arguments Without Opposition
By
–
AI developers argue non-expressive use and nobody is challenging them on that! I see your arguments but nobody with money is doing anything…
-
Twitter Copyright Policy: Creators Get Nothing, Platform Takes Cut
By
–
The report says nothing about Copyright, licensing it nor selling it. Twitter wants a cut as middleman service and holders get nothing as per TOS. The Copyright is worth zero in this transaction. "If you disagree, leave" that's always been the message.
-
Twitter Monetizes Data Access Through API Service Licensing Model
By
–
Twitter wants to be paid for the process of storing the data and making it available conveniently via API. They're not selling Copyright, it's a service license.
-
AI License and Terms of Service Legal Framework
By
–
Nothing to do with Fair Use, it's a license and ToS question.
-
ML Data Use and User Privacy Consent on Social Platforms
By
–
By now (already last decade) ML use is not future and anyone still on the platform is explicitly consenting to continued use of the data. Copyright is not a good ground for primarily mediocre thoughtless Tweets, but privacy may be…
-
Rightsholders monetization rights on tech platforms
By
–
The rightsholders signed them away via TOS. Time for them to move to different platforms if they don't want to be monetized twice.
-
UK Workers Call for AI Workplace Regulation Survey
By
–
Almost 60% of people want regulation of #AI in #UK workplaces, survey finds https://
bit.ly/3J2jVe9 via @guardian #ethics #FutureofWork -
Taking Responsibility for AI-Generated Information Sources
By
–
I think, one has to take the responsibility if the information is from his/her desk/computer, source could be anything, including #ChatGPT
-
Web Scrapers: Essential for Keeping the Internet Open
By
–
Scrapers are the cause because without them, the web would remain open.