Which of these USB devices would your current security policy actually catch and block?
REGULATION
-
Policy Enforcement Failures in Security Controls Systems
By
–
Three ways policy fails: no policy exists, policy exists but isn't enforced, or privileged users override policy with admin credentials believing they're exempt from security controls.
-
Transient Devices Bypass Air Gap Security in Control Networks
By
–
Transient devices like vendor laptops plugged directly into control networks bypass the air gap entirely. The phone charging incident falls into this category with zero malicious intent.
-
USB Device Security Threats and Autonomous Attack Vectors
By
–
USB ports accept more than storage devices. Keyboards execute autonomous attacks on contact. Webcams carry embedded payloads. Network adapters create unauthorized connections. Removable media means any USB device. Partner content with OPSWAT. #opswat_ics pic.twitter.com/SZsCq8NOfu
— Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros) 12 avril 2026USB ports accept more than storage devices. Keyboards execute autonomous attacks on contact. Webcams carry embedded payloads. Network adapters create unauthorized connections. Removable media means any USB device. Partner content with OPSWAT. #opswat_ics
-
Freedom of Speech: Democracy’s Foundation in AI Era
By
–
Freedom of speech is the bedrock of democracy https://t.co/iX2BCGVrsH
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) 12 avril 2026Freedom of speech is the bedrock of democracy
-
EPR Construction Timeline and Strait of Hormuz Supply Chain Risks
By
–
J'ai envie de répondre à Damien. Mais j'ose pas. Néanmoins, voici quelques données pour contextualiser. 1/ Construire un EPR prend 15 ans
2/ Contrairement à ce qu'on pense, un blocage d'Ormuz ne crée pas simplement un surcoût, mais une rupture de stock (ce qui est bien pire, on -
CCP Economic Coercion Through China Market Access Control
By
–
Oh look, the good old CCP economic incentive playbook where they use selective China market access as a carrot for future coercion.
-
Chinese Bot Farms and Disinformation on Social Media Platforms
By
–
Does this apply to the CCP bots that reply swarm posts about topics the Chinese government wants to influence? I think something should be done about allowing these VPN enabled bot farms from China to pollute the dialog on here. Happens all the time with posts about Taiwan,
-
Genetic editing breakthrough transforms rare disease treatment paradigm
By
–
The turning point for rare diseases, which affect >300 million people around the world.
A call to get rid of its many structural obstacles, to consider it as molecular surgery unlike drug treatments
gift link: https://
nytimes.com/2026/04/09/opi
nion/genetic-editing-diseases-health-care.html?unlocked_article_code=1.aVA._Ngc.rcD9QiLWrfIM&smid=url-share
… -
PauseAI condemns attack on Altman, reaffirms nonviolence commitment
By
–
PauseAI unequivocally condemns the attack on Sam Altman's home and all forms of violence, intimidation, and harassment. We wish safety and peace to Sam Altman, his family, and everyone affected. A few online commentators have described this person as a "PauseAI activist". This is incorrect, and we take our commitment to nonviolence extremely seriously, so we want to make this clear. Here are the facts. – The suspect joined our public Discord server about two years ago. In that time, he posted a total of 34 messages. None contained explicit calls to violence. Our moderators nonetheless flagged one message as ambiguous and issued a warning out of caution. – He had no role in PauseAI, participated in no campaigns, attended no events, and received no support from us. – Following the attack, we banned him from our server. – A moderator began removing his messages as part of our standard process for banning users, but was stopped once we recognised they could be relevant to any investigation. Avoiding extreme situations like this one is exactly why we need a thriving Pause movement: – Concern about advanced AI risk is not fringe. It is shared by leading AI researchers, members of US Congress and UK Parliament, institutions like the Bank of England, and many of the developers building these systems. This concern is growing because the risks are real. – When millions of people are genuinely afraid for their future, some will look for ways to act. The question is whether they find a peaceful path or not. – PauseAI is that peaceful path. Every day, we organise lawful protests, petitions, policy advocacy, and public education. We give concerned people ways to act constructively, peacefully, and democratically. – Conversely, without a thriving Pause movement, concerned citizens have no effective outlet. No community. No one urging restraint. No accountability. The alternative is exactly what happened this week: isolated, desperate individuals acting alone and adversarially. Every one of you reading this can help us build capacity better and faster. Join our efforts. Together, let's create a peaceful movement so powerful that no one ever decides to take violent action out of desperation. Those who are now trying to use this tragedy to discredit AI safety advocacy should consider what world they are arguing for. A world where there is no organised, peaceful movement, but the fear remains, is a far more dangerous world. Undermining PauseAI does not make anyone safer, it makes further such incidents more likely. We will continue to condemn violence. We will continue to build a peaceful, democratic global movement. And we welcome anyone who shares our concern to join us. We have a high standard to meet in order to overcome the risks created by advanced AI.
→ View original post on X — @esyudkowsky, 2026-04-12 14:25 UTC