OK, so there is caselaw then. Do any come to mind? If this is true then models that are proven to contain protected expressions are necessarily derivatives of their datasets…
REGULATION
-
Copyright infringement rights sampling reproduction distribution
By
–
?? There are many rights within Copyright, and all of those can be infringed. A sample can infringe because of the Right Of Reproduction, Right To Distribute — it does not necessarily imply the Right To Make Derivatives was infringed.
-
AI Model Copyright Rulings: Derivative Works and Fair Use
By
–
In the AI rulings so far, some of the judges explicitly ruled out the "models as derivative" claims because the amount copied by models was minor and it didn't fit the usual definition of derivatives. That suggests small quotes don't count. Do you have ruling or caselaw?
-
Warhol Case Analysis: Reconciling Copyright Infringement Theory
By
–
Another inconsistency in your original take: you posted about this case yesterday, but it seems to invalidate your theory as well. (Warhol would also be infringing using this analysis.) How do you reconcile the two?
-
AWF Supreme Court: Unauthorized Derivatives and Fair Use Assessment
By
–
The perspective from the AWF Supreme Court ruling suggests that the "state" of the painting as infringing (or not) doesn't matter, only "uses" or actions do. And all of them must be reassessed according to four factors. Such is the burden of making an unauthorized derivative!
-
AI-Generated Art and Copyright: Fair Use Limitations Explained
By
–
The Warhol painting is an unauthorized derivative that doesn't even qualify for © protection (Anderson v. Stallone). Certain uses can be considered Fair Use, but others are not… at anytime and for any use, Goldsmith can object and seek remedies.
-
Copyright Attribution and Derivative Works in Creative AI
By
–
Unless you quote a huge part you're not making a derivative, it's just a quote. A better example is a cover song, which is generally considered a derivative in music today. Standard practice is to include the original author in the credits, and attribute/pay them accordingly.
-
Fair Use for AI Derivatives: Legal Boundaries and Licensing Markets
By
–
You agree it's a derivative, but claim all downstream uses except licensing in the same market are covered by "Fair Use"?
-
China Market Access Trade-offs in Tech Industry
By
–
Yes. But that China market access is hard to give up for many. So that’s their choice.
-
Mandarin AI Content: Avoiding Authoritarian Government Control
By
–
Insecure authoritarian governments can weaponize access to its market for political leverage.
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 11 mai 2024
But they don’t have to have a monopoly on Mandarin language content globally.
It’s possible to create content for Mandarin audiences without the pressure of one government while… pic.twitter.com/ffM9FxvvwCInsecure authoritarian governments can weaponize access to its market for political leverage. But they don’t have to have a monopoly on Mandarin language content globally. It’s possible to create content for Mandarin audiences without the pressure of one government while