Something to mull over this weekend. The world is still in a massive Dunning-Kruger moment—quibbling over whether AI is merely a productivity enhancer or fixating on Trump—while the U.S. and China further position themselves to dominate core AI infrastructure, as well as AI
REGULATION
-
US and UK Reject Common AI Ethics Declaration at Summit
By
–
IA : la double fracture Le Sommet pour l’action de l’IA a révélé une fracture grandissante. Alors que l’Europe tente de se structurer, les États-Unis et le Royaume-Uni refusent de signer la déclaration finale commune sur une IA éthique et ouverte. Au menu de cette 27e
-
Data Protection: Essential Business Strategy for 2025
By
–
Protecting Sensitive #Data: The Cornerstone Of Business Strategy In 2025
by Rich Vibert @Forbes Learn more: https://
buff.ly/40VvA6C #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #DeepLearning cc: @terenceleungsf @miketamir @kirkdborne -
AI Power: Compute, Energy, and Geopolitical Control in 2026
By
–
Bottom Line: AI is no longer just about technology; it’s about who wields power in the 21st century. We are seeing the industrialization of intelligence, and the nations that control compute, energy, and infrastructure will define the future.
-
AI as Sovereign Asset: Nations Race for Strategic Independence
By
–
2. National Interest Rules – Why Wouldn’t It? Nations have now internalized what was always inevitable: AI is a sovereign asset. The U.S. is pouring billions into semiconductor independence, China is aggressively building nuclear power stations, and even the EU is waking up to
-
AI Safety Governance Fails Under Geopolitical Pressures
By
–
3. ‘AI Safety’ via Multilateral Forums? Dead.
The idea that AI safety can be meaningfully governed through international collaboration is collapsing under geopolitical realities. The U.S., China, and the EU have fundamentally different views on AI regulation, and national -
Geopolitics Reshapes AI Governance as Multilateral Cooperation Crumbles
By
–
1. Realpolitik is Back – Buckle Up The era of multilateral cooperation in AI governance is crumbling. We’re entering a phase where hard power, strategic resources, and national security imperatives are the driving forces behind AI development. The U.S. is tightening export
-
AI Geopolitics: Power, Compute, and National Interest Shift
By
–
I have always argued that AI is about POWER. This week proves it.
— Nina Schick (@NinaDSchick) 14 février 2025
The geopolitics of AI is shifting fast. Here’s how:
– Realpolitik is back—buckle up.
– National interest rules—why wouldn’t it?
– ‘AI safety’ via multilateral forums? Dead.
– Energy & compute = the most… pic.twitter.com/AQacWLTxpTI have always argued that AI is about POWER. This week proves it. The geopolitics of AI is shifting fast. Here’s how: – Realpolitik is back—buckle up.
– National interest rules—why wouldn’t it?
– ‘AI safety’ via multilateral forums? Dead.
– Energy & compute = the most -
Standardized Testing Impact on Child Pedagogy and Learning
By
–
That is absolutely part of the question, but I would even start earlier. How does pedagogy itself change? Does it make sense (particularly in the UK), to be obesses over the performance of young children in standardized tests? The argument that this actually strips them of their
-
Independent AI Evaluation Essential for Safety Accountability
By
–
New policy brief: Independent evaluation is essential to ensuring the safety and accountability of AI systems. Our latest brief examines the barriers to independent AI evaluation and proposes safe harbors to protect third-party research. https://
hai.stanford.edu/safeguarding-t
hird-party-ai-research
…