C’est sorti : le FlashCahier de Rentrée
8 enjeux IA pour préparer 2026 : AI Act GEO Agents & humanoïdes Shadow IA IA frugale Confiance Perspectives 2026 Une boussole stratégique pour décideurs pressés. À lire dans Mes Flashs de la Semaine
REGULATION
-
Eight AI Challenges to Prepare for 2026: Strategic Guide
By
–
-
Anthropic Hires Google Books Project Partnership Former Head
By
–
Anthropic actually hired the "former head of partnerships for Google's book-scanning project" for this
-
Lawsuit Over Illegal Pirated Content Downloads Prior 2024
By
–
That's exactly what they are doing now – the lawsuit was over their activities prior to 2024 where they were found to have downloaded illegal pirated copies
-
AI Training on Books: Legal and Economic Implications
By
–
They'll only lay you that $3,000 if they are caught pirating your book – if they buy your physical book (or a second hand copy) they can train on it for much less money than that
-
Authors’ Copyright Concerns in AI Training Data Usage
By
–
Doesn't help the millions of authors who's books were used for training data without being one of the 500,000 that were illegally downloaded
-
AI Training Data and Book Economic Value Impact
By
–
I'm don't think that an AI company scanning a book for training data completely destroys the economic value of that book
-
Fair Use and Book Scanning for AI Training: Legal Gray Areas
By
–
To clarify: it appears it is legal, at least in the USA, to buy a used copy of a physical book (used = the author gets nothing), chop the spine off, scan the pages, discard the paper copy and then train on the scanned content The transformation from paper to scan is "fair use"
-
AI Training on Books: Legal Loopholes Harm Authors
By
–
A book is only worth $3000 if the AI company illegally downloads it and gets caught If the AI company buys a used copy for 50 cents and destructively scans it (which apparently is allowed now) the author gets nothing
-
Global concern raises alarm for free world security
By
–
Ceci devrait beaucoup inquiéter le Monde libre.
-
Max’s AGI Safety Arguments Face Criticism for Political Bias
By
–
This is not the argument that Max has been making here. He is insinuating that if some users might be confused by a toy, that should be regarded as evidence of the dangers of AGI, trigger regulation etc. He plays politics, and by being unserious, harms the cause of safety.