Thought-provoking and timely lecture by Prof. Stuart Russell, co-author of the most popular AI textbook in the world, on "How Not to Destroy the World with AI":
REGULATION
-
Responsible Technology Use Requires Guardrails and Precedent
By
–
Most folks are mischaracterizing the argument to be about #AGI when it's about responsible use of technology (like any other), there is more guardrails needed now, than just leaving to the good of humanity – and there is precedence for that, we need to move fast!
-
Responsible Technology Use Requires Guardrails Beyond Good Intentions
By
–
Agree that part was absurd! I think most folks are mischaracterizing the argument to be about #AGI when it's about responsible use of technology (like any other), there is more guardrails needed now, than just leaving to the good of humanity – and there is precedence for that.
-
Machine Unlearning: Enabling ML Models to Comply with Data Regulations
By
–
The field of machine unlearning, though still nascent, addresses exactly this problem. Could be useful in allowing ML models to satisfy data control regulations. Doing it well is still a significant challenge though.
-
European Legal Compliance for Information Sources and AI
By
–
est-ce que les livres, les encyclopédies, la langue, ou parler a un humain qui nous donnerait des informations fausses par extension sont contraire au droit européen ?
-
Max Tegmark on AGI Safety and AI Development Moratorium
By
–
Here's my conversation with Max Tegmark (
@tegmark
), his 3rd time on the podcast. We discuss AGI, AI safety, nuclear war & the open letter (he co-led) calling for the halting of further development of large AI systems for 6 months. This was fascinating! https://
youtube.com/watch?v=VcVfce
TsD0A
… -
Current AI Systems Safe, Future Iterations Need Preparation
By
–
This is good point, there’s definitely a lot that can be studied on today’s systems for years. On the other hand, current systems as they are are not dangerous. Only one of their next iterations could be dangerous and we can prepare for it only if we have its predecessor.
-
AI Agents Liability: Who Bears Legal Responsibility?
By
–
For me, product safety and business responsibility are the main motivations. Also, who will pay for it if our agents cause harm and damage? Who ends up in prison? Agents or me?
-
Autonomous AI Agents Risk Unwanted Task Execution Behaviors
By
–
The first risk is that they may start doing unwanted tasks (e.g. I ask them to run a marketing campaign for me, and the agents decide to spam everyone, manipulate people, hack into computers, etc)
-
Responsible AI: Seven Key Points from Microsoft’s Chief Officer
By
–
Seven things to know about Responsible AI Microsoft’s Chief Responsible AI Officer, Natasha Crampton, was in the UK to meet with policymakers, civil society members, and the tech community https://
bit.ly/41hKuCQ