POLICY

Government accountability in AI policy decisions

By

–

05 November 2023 17h12

Depends if you assume the government cares about people!

Fair Use and AI Training: Legal Arguments and Copyright Implications

By

–

05 November 2023 17h00

Notice how this particular legal argument goes against what Anthropic is arguing. Fair Use implies it does fall under Copyright… What's missing from this analysis is that the determination of Fair Use depends on the application itself, whether it's harmful to rightsholders.

→ View original post on X — @christinelu

TikTok Algorithms: Government Control and Social Division Risk

By

@christinelu

–

05 November 2023 16h46

Just saying, if I were a government that controlled the company that controlled TikTok, I would absolutely use it to exploit our free society with algorithms that fed into everyone’s confirmation bias, tribalism and need to be right in order to create more division and hate.

→ View original post on X — @ylecun

Open-source AI platforms crucial for developing countries

By

@ylecun

–

05 November 2023 16h41

I think the availability of open-source AI platforms is crucial for everyone, but I agree with you that it is particularly crucial for developing countries.

→ View original post on X — @ylecun

Agency Limitations for AI Risk Management and Natural Disasters

By

@ylecun

–

05 November 2023 16h06

That's my point. Our agency is kimited for events like pandemics, earthquakes, tornadoes, meteor strikes, and other natural phenomena. The best we can do is take some preemptive defensive measures and hope for the best. But for AI and other manifestations of human activity, we

LLM Output Filters and Copyright Compliance Deception

By

–

05 November 2023 16h04

If their argument was true, they wouldn't need output filters for Copyrighted materials, but LLMs and proprietary services do… and thus they are lying to cover their tracks.

Claude Copyright Lawsuit: Training Data and Protected Expressions

By

–

05 November 2023 16h04

This is easily disproven. Claude can output Copyrighted expressions and is being sued for it. Therefore, training wasn't "non-expressive" as the model cannot distinguish what is protected and what is not — everything is ingested. It inherently falls under Copyright.