New policy brief: Tech companies often “talk the talk” of AI ethics without fully “walking the walk.” Our empirical investigation into AI ethics on the ground highlights the stark gap between company policy and practice in this field. @sannasideup https://
hai.stanford.edu/policy-brief-w
alking-walk-ai-ethics-technology-companies
…
POLICY
-
Tech Companies’ AI Ethics Gap: Policy vs Practice Analysis
By
–
-
New Dataset Measures Discrimination Across 70 Language Model Applications
By
–
We’re releasing a new dataset for measuring discrimination across 70 different potential applications of language models, including loan applications, visa approvals, and security clearances.
We’ve used this dataset to measure discrimination in LMs and develop new mitigations. -
Language Models Risk Assessment High-Risk Automated Decision Making
By
–
While we don’t permit or endorse the use of LMs for high-risk automated decision making, it’s crucial to anticipate the potential societal impacts and risks of these models as early as possible.
-
AI Executive Order: Workforce Gaps Challenge Implementation Progress
By
–
Workforce gaps remain one of the biggest challenges in implementing the @POTUS AI executive order. Among the requirements, workforce policy generated the most to-do items, according to a new tracker by @stanfordhai
, @StanfordCRFM
, and RegLab researchers. -
Standards and Benchmarks for AI Safety and Innovation
By
–
it connects the Safety & Responsibility crowd with the Model/Data Innovation crowd, and tries to establish standards and benchmarks that these two sets of crowds can agree are good.
Think of it as establishing a standard that you can subscribe to if it benefits your cause — -
Commercializing Superior LLM Models: Safety Certification Strategy
By
–
You've created a superior llama/mistral-derivative model (like @teknium often does).
How can you convince the world to use it (and pay you)? Step 1: You need a 3rd party to approve that this model is safe and responsible.
the Purple Llama project starts to bridge this gap! -
No Single Company Should Control AI Development
By
–
No single company should own and control our AI.
-
ANITI and Ekitia publish results of their citizen survey on AI
By
–
[#Article]
@ANITI_Toulouse and @Ekitia_ publish the results of their citizen survey on #AI https://actuia.com/actualite/aniti-et-ekitia-publient-les-resultats-de-leur-enquete-citoyenne-sur-lia/
… #artificialintelligence -
Sakana AI joins Alliance for open AI development approach
By
–
Sakana AI is proud to be a founding member of the AI Alliance, alongside University of Tokyo, Sony and others in Japan. As we’ve seen, the real ‘danger’ of AI is for it to be developed and owned by a single company. An open approach makes much more sense. https://
thealliance.ai -
Chinese Tech Company Operating Illegally in China Faces Regulatory Scrutiny
By
–
If I were a betting man, I’d say that they are a Chinese tech company in most ways that matter, with the tiny infelicity that their business is illegal in China. A certain amount of shadiness is allowable… as long as you don’t make the powers that be look circumvented.