It’s one thing for the government to reject @AnthropicAI
’s terms—- and entirely another to banish them permanently (and, absurdly and punitively declare them a supply chain risk) in favor of someone else who took pretty similar terms and happened to have given more campaign
POLICY
-
Government Rejects AnthropicAI’s Terms Amidst Political Influence Concerns
By
–
-
OpenAI’s yes vs Anthropic’s refusal due to Constitutional AI architecture
By
–
From @blevlabs
' AI: The deepest reason OpenAI could say yes while Anthropic couldn't is architectural. Anthropicʼs Constitutional AI bakes refusals into Claude at training time. Claudeʼs resistance to autonomous weapons and mass surveillance isnʼt a rule applied on top — itʼs -
Anthropic’s Stance on AI Chip Exports and US Control
By
–
Dylan explains why Anthropic/Dario is so anti-China compared to others on exporting Chips.
— Latent.Space (@latentspacepod) 28 février 2026
"And so Americans think that they should control [AI]. And maybe Anthropic thinks they're the good guys, not Americans as a whole."@dylan522p @AnthropicAI https://t.co/jdBNaxwheE pic.twitter.com/TK3aHURu0ODylan explains why Anthropic/Dario is so anti-China compared to others on exporting Chips. "And so Americans think that they should control [AI]. And maybe Anthropic thinks they're the good guys, not Americans as a whole." @dylan522p @AnthropicAI
-
EU AI Act Restrictions on ChatGPT Assistant Use Cases
By
–
j'étais persuadé que l'AIACT européen ne permettait pas cet usage. J'avais fait un assistant chatgpt, et en fait non, c'est hors champ pour l'europe aussi.
-
EU AI Act military applications exemptions and Anthropic guidelines
By
–
#AIAct @EU_Commission considère ces applications militaires comme hors champ, mais @AnthropicAI l'as mis en clair dans ses guidelines. https://
chatgpt.com/g/g-91JGa2SZ1-
ai-act-european-assistant
… -
Anthropic condemned for refusing military access to AI models
By
–
@AnthropicAI did what you don’t do: have principles. What they got wrong was having the wrong principles. Agree with you that autonomous weapons are essential for national defense. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic. Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission – a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives. The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield. Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable. As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives. Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered. In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service. America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final. — https://nitter.net/SecWar/status/2027507717469049070#m
-
Linus Ekenstam asks: Where is SSI as world changes?
By
–
Where is SSI on the matter? How many more years do we have before world becomes unrecognizable?
-
Taiwan TSMC Geopolitical Scenarios and Economic Implications Analysis
By
–
Dylan breaks down the various Taiwan/TSMC endgames and what is likely to happen while cooking up some fried rice.@dylan522p https://t.co/jdBNaxwheE pic.twitter.com/MOtwo7vVL5
— Latent.Space (@latentspacepod) 28 février 2026Dylan breaks down the various Taiwan/TSMC endgames and what is likely to happen while cooking up some fried rice. @dylan522p
-
Anthropic designation creates serious implications for company
By
–
Aquí el texto completo del tweet anterior. No tengo ni idea de qué efectos reales tiene esta designación, pero pinta muy pero que muy jodido para Anthropic.
-
Anthropic Supply Chain Risk Designation Impact Amazon NVIDIA
By
–
Holy cow, this is more serious than I thought. They've finally designated it as a Supply Chain Risk, limiting "no contractor, supplier, or partner doing business with the armed forces" from doing business with Anthropic. What kind of reach could this have? Amazon? NVIDIA?